1
00:00:00,425 --> 00:00:01,014
Is high EQ

2
00:00:01,385 --> 00:00:02,383
innate

3
00:00:02,384 --> 00:00:04,134
or forced by a lack of love in childhood?

4
00:00:04,865 --> 00:00:06,314
You must have seen someone like this:

5
00:00:06,585 --> 00:00:07,694
they walk into a room

6
00:00:08,185 --> 00:00:09,314
and within seconds,

7
00:00:09,345 --> 00:00:11,273
they know who's in a bad mood,

8
00:00:11,425 --> 00:00:13,194
who's having tension with whom,

9
00:00:13,384 --> 00:00:14,333
what can be said,

10
00:00:14,744 --> 00:00:16,353
and what topics to strictly avoid.

11
00:00:16,864 --> 00:00:19,064
It's as if they have an invisible antenna

12
00:00:19,065 --> 00:00:22,474
that picks up unspoken signals in the air.

13
00:00:22,945 --> 00:00:24,693
We call this social savviness,

14
00:00:24,984 --> 00:00:26,274
or high EQ.

15
00:00:26,864 --> 00:00:27,774
So, where does this antenna

16
00:00:28,105 --> 00:00:29,414
actually come from?

17
00:00:30,024 --> 00:00:31,583
Is it born in them,

18
00:00:31,585 --> 00:00:32,933
or developed later?

19
00:00:33,545 --> 00:00:36,834
The other day, a friend told me something that shook me.

20
00:00:37,185 --> 00:00:37,533
He said,

21
00:00:37,905 --> 00:00:39,194
high EQ

22
00:00:39,344 --> 00:00:41,314
is often not cultivated through a privileged upbringing,

23
00:00:41,384 --> 00:00:44,033
but rather born from deprivation and lack of love.

24
00:00:44,265 --> 00:00:45,234
A child

25
00:00:45,265 --> 00:00:48,433
who lacks stable love and protection from parents

26
00:00:48,625 --> 00:00:49,993
will, for their own safety,

27
00:00:50,064 --> 00:00:53,814
be forced to evolve a hypersensitivity to others' moods.

28
00:00:54,344 --> 00:00:57,503
They must learn to read an adult's face

29
00:00:57,505 --> 00:00:59,353
before the weather of that face shifts.

30
00:01:00,024 --> 00:01:02,073
I didn't rush to argue after hearing this,

31
00:01:02,265 --> 00:01:04,183
because it seemed to make too much sense.

32
00:01:04,185 --> 00:01:06,353
So much sense that it's a bit heartbreaking.

33
00:01:06,864 --> 00:01:07,614
But making sense

34
00:01:07,825 --> 00:01:09,114
doesn't make it true.

35
00:01:09,424 --> 00:01:10,093
So today,

36
00:01:10,545 --> 00:01:12,433
we'll use the latest science

37
00:01:12,465 --> 00:01:14,743
to investigate whether this claim

38
00:01:14,745 --> 00:01:16,433
actually holds water.

39
00:01:16,905 --> 00:01:17,254
Hello,

40
00:01:17,344 --> 00:01:17,813
everyone.

41
00:01:17,944 --> 00:01:18,993
I'm Wang Lijie.

42
00:01:19,385 --> 00:01:22,390
First, a conclusion that might disappoint my friend:

43
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:23,864
EQ

44
00:01:23,864 --> 00:01:25,174
does have an innate component,

45
00:01:25,424 --> 00:01:26,793
and it's not a small one.

46
00:01:27,504 --> 00:01:28,974
The favorite tool of scientists

47
00:01:29,344 --> 00:01:30,713
is twin studies.

48
00:01:30,984 --> 00:01:34,153
By comparing identical and fraternal twins,

49
00:01:34,224 --> 00:01:36,313
they can estimate how much a trait

50
00:01:36,385 --> 00:01:38,353
is influenced by genetics.

51
00:01:38,745 --> 00:01:41,313
The result: for 'trait EQ,'

52
00:01:41,344 --> 00:01:44,793
heritability is between 40% and 45%.

53
00:01:45,064 --> 00:01:45,953
In other words,

54
00:01:45,984 --> 00:01:49,103
your innate emotional hardware—how sensitive you are,

55
00:01:49,105 --> 00:01:50,233
how easily you empathize,

56
00:01:50,305 --> 00:01:53,353
and how well you stay calm—is nearly 50%

57
00:01:53,385 --> 00:01:56,153
pre-installed by your genes at the factory.

58
00:01:56,465 --> 00:01:58,073
You might think,

59
00:01:58,224 --> 00:02:00,694
'Doesn't that prove EQ is mostly innate?'

60
00:02:01,224 --> 00:02:01,614
Not so fast.

61
00:02:02,064 --> 00:02:03,504
The truly interesting part

62
00:02:03,504 --> 00:02:06,233
is the remaining half of environmental factors.

63
00:02:06,584 --> 00:02:09,033
Scientists split the environment into two types.

64
00:02:09,264 --> 00:02:10,993
One is the 'shared environment,'

65
00:02:11,025 --> 00:02:13,973
the general atmosphere the whole family lives in.

66
00:02:14,585 --> 00:02:15,794
Is the family wealthy?

67
00:02:15,944 --> 00:02:16,933
What are the parents' beliefs?

68
00:02:17,185 --> 00:02:19,033
Is the household strict or relaxed?

69
00:02:19,104 --> 00:02:21,674
These are shared by all siblings.

70
00:02:22,064 --> 00:02:24,234
The other is the 'non-shared environment,'

71
00:02:24,264 --> 00:02:27,873
experiences unique to you that no one else can replace.

72
00:02:28,264 --> 00:02:30,193
The result is very surprising.

73
00:02:30,544 --> 00:02:33,674
The environmental factors that determine your EQ

74
00:02:33,705 --> 00:02:36,913
come almost entirely from the non-shared environment,

75
00:02:37,025 --> 00:02:39,633
not the general family atmosphere.

76
00:02:39,944 --> 00:02:40,653
What does this mean?

77
00:02:41,183 --> 00:02:41,984
It means

78
00:02:41,985 --> 00:02:45,144
what truly sculpts your EQ into what it is today

79
00:02:45,145 --> 00:02:47,674
often isn't how warm your home was overall,

80
00:02:47,745 --> 00:02:48,614
but your individual experiences.

81
00:02:48,905 --> 00:02:50,674
at specific moments...

82
00:02:50,784 --> 00:02:52,514
...the things you experienced alone.

83
00:02:53,305 --> 00:02:55,234
This is actually quite counterintuitive.

84
00:02:55,705 --> 00:02:56,454
Same parents,

85
00:02:56,705 --> 00:02:57,713
same roof,

86
00:02:57,745 --> 00:02:59,274
yet two children raised together

87
00:02:59,305 --> 00:03:01,473
can have vastly different EQs.

88
00:03:01,664 --> 00:03:04,593
We tend to chalk it up to innate personality,

89
00:03:04,905 --> 00:03:06,373
but science reminds us

90
00:03:06,705 --> 00:03:09,343
there is another layer: even in the same home,

91
00:03:09,344 --> 00:03:11,063
what the firstborn and the second-born experience

92
00:03:11,064 --> 00:03:13,033
are two completely different worlds.

93
00:03:13,465 --> 00:03:17,033
When the first was born, parents were young, energetic, and hectic.

94
00:03:17,145 --> 00:03:19,653
By the second one, they were much more relaxed.

95
00:03:20,185 --> 00:03:22,913
The first might have witnessed their worst fights,

96
00:03:22,985 --> 00:03:24,713
while the second missed them entirely.

97
00:03:24,944 --> 00:03:29,274
These solo experiences, not shared with siblings,

98
00:03:29,305 --> 00:03:32,114
are what truly, quietly shape one's perception.

99
00:03:32,625 --> 00:03:33,584
Have you noticed?

100
00:03:33,585 --> 00:03:35,463
This actually opens a door

101
00:03:35,465 --> 00:03:36,514
for my friend’s theory.

102
00:03:36,865 --> 00:03:41,234
Because moments of facing danger alone without protection

103
00:03:41,384 --> 00:03:44,753
are the most private, unshared experiences.

104
00:03:45,145 --> 00:03:46,133
But behind this door,

105
00:03:46,425 --> 00:03:47,693
is there anything of substance?

106
00:03:48,468 --> 00:03:49,269
Yes,

107
00:03:49,344 --> 00:03:50,873
and it's heartbreakingly solid.

108
00:03:51,224 --> 00:03:53,264
A scientist named Pollak

109
00:03:53,264 --> 00:03:56,114
conducted a series of experiments that are now classics.

110
00:03:56,425 --> 00:03:59,913
He studied children who had suffered physical abuse at home.

111
00:04:00,104 --> 00:04:02,274
He showed these children images of faces

112
00:04:02,504 --> 00:04:04,424
that shifted from expressionless

113
00:04:04,425 --> 00:04:07,313
slowly, bit by bit, into a certain emotion.

114
00:04:07,664 --> 00:04:10,743
Typical children wait until the expression is obvious

115
00:04:10,745 --> 00:04:12,234
before recognizing it as anger.

116
00:04:12,384 --> 00:04:13,973
But what about those abused children?

117
00:04:14,664 --> 00:04:17,713
At the first faint glimmer of rage,

118
00:04:17,904 --> 00:04:20,194
before most social cues even appeared,

119
00:04:20,345 --> 00:04:23,473
they accurately identified that this person

120
00:04:23,545 --> 00:04:24,634
was about to explode.

121
00:04:24,944 --> 00:04:26,194
And it wasn't just speed of recognition.

122
00:04:26,584 --> 00:04:28,113
These children's attention

123
00:04:28,185 --> 00:04:31,754
would lock onto the angry face like a magnet,

124
00:04:31,944 --> 00:04:33,033
making it hard to look away.

125
00:04:33,384 --> 00:04:34,793
Think about that for a moment.

126
00:04:35,144 --> 00:04:36,213
These children's brains

127
00:04:36,504 --> 00:04:38,384
have literally and tangibly

128
00:04:38,384 --> 00:04:40,994
rewritten the way they see the world.

129
00:04:41,305 --> 00:04:42,744
The brain diverts precious processing power

130
00:04:42,745 --> 00:04:44,553
from other areas

131
00:04:44,625 --> 00:04:48,353
to prioritize one task: detecting danger

132
00:04:48,464 --> 00:04:50,394
before it actually erupts.

133
00:04:50,985 --> 00:04:53,903
Isn't this exactly what my friend said?

134
00:04:53,904 --> 00:04:57,394
Evolving social intelligence just to feel safe.

135
00:04:57,665 --> 00:04:59,334
Only, science tells us

136
00:04:59,584 --> 00:05:00,624
this evolution

137
00:05:00,625 --> 00:05:03,394
is precise down to the neural and perceptual level.

138
00:05:03,824 --> 00:05:05,824
An unprotected child

139
00:05:05,824 --> 00:05:07,223
reallocates brain resources

140
00:05:07,225 --> 00:05:09,824
to the singular task of 'reading' people.

141
00:05:09,824 --> 00:05:12,713
This reminds me of the 'mind-reading' we've discussed.

142
00:05:13,144 --> 00:05:13,894
Back then, we said

143
00:05:14,345 --> 00:05:16,184
so-called mind-reading

144
00:05:16,185 --> 00:05:17,553
is largely

145
00:05:17,665 --> 00:05:19,853
a trainable skill—

146
00:05:20,064 --> 00:05:23,593
a hyper-sensitivity to micro-expressions and vibes.

147
00:05:24,144 --> 00:05:24,454
You see,

148
00:05:24,824 --> 00:05:26,223
Pollak's subjects

149
00:05:26,225 --> 00:05:28,223
completed this training in the cruelest way possible

150
00:05:28,225 --> 00:05:30,793
during their childhood.

151
00:05:31,305 --> 00:05:32,264
And this connects to

152
00:05:32,264 --> 00:05:35,293
the most significant paradigm shift

153
00:05:35,305 --> 00:05:37,033
in developmental psychology over the last decade.

154
00:05:37,305 --> 00:05:37,694
In the past,

155
00:05:38,064 --> 00:05:40,033
scientists viewed childhood adversity

156
00:05:40,064 --> 00:05:43,463
through a 'deficit model'—childhood suffering

157
00:05:43,464 --> 00:05:44,913
was brain damage,

158
00:05:44,985 --> 00:05:47,113
a scar that needed to be patched.

159
00:05:47,345 --> 00:05:48,834
But two scientists,

160
00:05:48,865 --> 00:05:50,913
Ellis and Frankenhuis...

161
00:05:50,944 --> 00:05:52,824
proposed a brand new framework

162
00:05:52,824 --> 00:05:54,394
called "Hidden Talents."

163
00:05:54,504 --> 00:05:54,934
They argue that

164
00:05:55,225 --> 00:05:57,264
the abilities developed by children

165
00:05:57,264 --> 00:05:58,504
growing up in harsh environments

166
00:05:58,504 --> 00:05:59,374
aren't just damage;

167
00:05:59,665 --> 00:06:01,033
they are a form of specialization.

168
00:06:01,345 --> 00:06:02,634
Like a computer

169
00:06:02,665 --> 00:06:04,584
built to run in extreme conditions,

170
00:06:04,584 --> 00:06:06,713
certain functions are specifically optimized.

171
00:06:07,024 --> 00:06:11,064
Evidence is mounting: those with unpredictable childhoods

172
00:06:11,064 --> 00:06:13,593
often perform better

173
00:06:13,625 --> 00:06:15,033
at rapid task-switching as adults.

174
00:06:15,105 --> 00:06:18,014
A volatile environment forces them to be flexible.

175
00:06:18,785 --> 00:06:22,394
Studies on children deprived of parental care found

176
00:06:22,545 --> 00:06:24,223
their working memory capacity

177
00:06:24,225 --> 00:06:25,733
actually exceeded that of their peers.

178
00:06:26,305 --> 00:06:28,504
Those exposed to violent environments

179
00:06:28,504 --> 00:06:32,663
remember dominance hierarchies—who is strong,

180
00:06:32,665 --> 00:06:34,033
and who not to mess with—exceptionally well.

181
00:06:34,584 --> 00:06:37,314
A systematic review of the field also found

182
00:06:37,425 --> 00:06:38,994
that those raised in adversity

183
00:06:39,024 --> 00:06:43,983
often develop sharper emotional awareness, better intuition,

184
00:06:43,985 --> 00:06:45,593
and even stronger empathy.

185
00:06:45,824 --> 00:06:47,514
These aren't defects;

186
00:06:47,584 --> 00:06:50,744
they are skills custom-tailored

187
00:06:50,745 --> 00:06:52,553
to survive in an unstable environment.

188
00:06:53,024 --> 00:06:54,574
Why is the brain designed this way?

189
00:06:55,064 --> 00:06:57,735
It goes back to a topic we discuss often on this channel:

190
00:06:57,745 --> 00:06:59,343
Your brain

191
00:06:59,345 --> 00:07:01,593
is essentially a prediction machine.

192
00:07:01,785 --> 00:07:03,473
It is constantly guessing

193
00:07:03,545 --> 00:07:05,274
what will happen next.

194
00:07:05,425 --> 00:07:07,343
And what data does it use

195
00:07:07,345 --> 00:07:08,814
to train its predictive models?

196
00:07:09,264 --> 00:07:11,074
Precisely your early life experiences.

197
00:07:11,305 --> 00:07:14,973
The brain treats childhood as a sample report for the future.

198
00:07:15,504 --> 00:07:19,673
If the sample is full of danger and unpredictability,

199
00:07:19,704 --> 00:07:23,293
the brain concludes: "The world I will live in

200
00:07:23,464 --> 00:07:24,593
is unsafe."

201
00:07:24,704 --> 00:07:26,744
So it calibrates itself in advance,

202
00:07:26,745 --> 00:07:29,954
betting all resources on vigilance and reading people.

203
00:07:30,225 --> 00:07:31,014
This isn't a glitch.

204
00:07:31,305 --> 00:07:32,944
It is a precision instrument

205
00:07:32,944 --> 00:07:34,624
making the most logical response

206
00:07:34,625 --> 00:07:36,473
based on the data it has collected.

207
00:07:36,785 --> 00:07:37,494
In other words,

208
00:07:37,865 --> 00:07:39,463
that high-EQ child

209
00:07:39,464 --> 00:07:40,903
doesn't have a broken brain.

210
00:07:40,904 --> 00:07:42,874
Their brain is actually very clever—

211
00:07:42,944 --> 00:07:45,793
clever enough to prepare for a hard battle in advance.

212
00:07:46,185 --> 00:07:46,494
So,

213
00:07:46,785 --> 00:07:48,184
my friend's intuition

214
00:07:48,185 --> 00:07:49,553
wasn't just folk wisdom.

215
00:07:49,584 --> 00:07:53,625
It aligns with the cutting edge of science: adversity

216
00:07:53,625 --> 00:07:55,144
doesn't just destroy a person;

217
00:07:55,144 --> 00:07:56,983
in specific ways,

218
00:07:56,985 --> 00:07:59,913
it sharpens them into an exceptionally keen blade.

219
00:08:00,384 --> 00:08:00,853
At this point,

220
00:08:01,305 --> 00:08:03,343
you might think lack of love is a good thing,

221
00:08:03,345 --> 00:08:04,173
a blessing in disguise.

222
00:08:04,709 --> 00:08:05,509
Stop right there.

223
00:08:05,824 --> 00:08:07,634
The following two "buts"

224
00:08:07,665 --> 00:08:09,954
are what I really want to tell you today.

225
00:08:10,345 --> 00:08:11,014
The first "but"

226
00:08:11,305 --> 00:08:12,153
is the cost.

227
00:08:12,504 --> 00:08:14,514
Pollak's research also found

228
00:08:14,704 --> 00:08:17,514
that this hyper-sensitive vigilance system

229
00:08:17,545 --> 00:08:18,754
comes with a bill.

230
00:08:19,024 --> 00:08:21,024
This excessive focus on threats

231
00:08:21,024 --> 00:08:22,673
leads directly to anxiety.

232
00:08:22,985 --> 00:08:23,533
Simply put,

233
00:08:23,865 --> 00:08:26,074
children who are experts at reading faces

234
00:08:26,105 --> 00:08:30,353
are often those who are more tense and can't relax.

235
00:08:30,704 --> 00:08:33,714
Their antennae scan the room non-stop,

236
00:08:33,945 --> 00:08:36,144
meaning they almost never have a second

237
00:08:36,144 --> 00:08:38,433
where they can let their guard down and just be at peace.

238
00:08:38,945 --> 00:08:41,994
We must never romanticize the lack of love.

239
00:08:42,184 --> 00:08:44,073
The sharp blade is real,

240
00:08:44,105 --> 00:08:46,344
but the sharpening process is bloody.

241
00:08:46,345 --> 00:08:49,474
And the edge can turn back and cut the person holding it.

242
00:08:49,945 --> 00:08:50,734
The second 'but'

243
00:08:51,024 --> 00:08:51,994
is context.

244
00:08:52,424 --> 00:08:54,543
These skills forced out by adversity

245
00:08:54,544 --> 00:08:58,423
have a key trait: they shine brightest

246
00:08:58,424 --> 00:08:59,874
primarily in stressful situations.

247
00:09:00,225 --> 00:09:01,193
In other words,

248
00:09:01,264 --> 00:09:05,624
a child who learns 'mind-reading' in a volatile family environment

249
00:09:05,625 --> 00:09:08,433
and then moves to a safe, relaxed setting,

250
00:09:08,465 --> 00:09:10,423
will find their hyper-vigilance system

251
00:09:10,424 --> 00:09:14,183
actually overreacting—reading layers of non-existent hostility

252
00:09:14,184 --> 00:09:17,114
into someone's casual, harmless remark.

253
00:09:17,345 --> 00:09:19,553
These skills are designed for the battlefield.

254
00:09:19,585 --> 00:09:20,903
When brought into times of peace,

255
00:09:20,904 --> 00:09:22,953
they sometimes fail to adapt.

256
00:09:23,465 --> 00:09:23,653
Alright,

257
00:09:24,024 --> 00:09:25,114
after all that setup,

258
00:09:25,264 --> 00:09:28,423
we can finally answer that trickier question,

259
00:09:28,424 --> 00:09:29,935
the second one that friend asked me:

260
00:09:29,945 --> 00:09:33,033
If someone isn't naturally very intelligent

261
00:09:33,065 --> 00:09:35,033
but is thrown into a complex environment,

262
00:09:35,105 --> 00:09:37,053
can they still evolve high EQ?

263
00:09:37,585 --> 00:09:38,744
To answer this,

264
00:09:38,745 --> 00:09:40,953
we must first make a key distinction.

265
00:09:41,225 --> 00:09:42,494
Understanding others

266
00:09:42,784 --> 00:09:44,514
might sound instinctive,

267
00:09:44,585 --> 00:09:46,354
but it's not free.

268
00:09:46,384 --> 00:09:48,234
It consumes cognitive machinery.

269
00:09:48,825 --> 00:09:49,913
Scientists have found

270
00:09:50,024 --> 00:09:51,854
that the aspect of EQ involving emotional understanding—

271
00:09:52,105 --> 00:09:54,104
not just sensing someone is unhappy,

272
00:09:54,105 --> 00:09:56,214
but figuring out why,

273
00:09:56,544 --> 00:09:59,224
and how they might act next—this ability

274
00:09:59,225 --> 00:10:03,344
is closely linked to our Theory of Mind and crystallized intelligence,

275
00:10:03,345 --> 00:10:04,833
which is built through accumulation.

276
00:10:05,144 --> 00:10:05,813
That is to say,

277
00:10:06,184 --> 00:10:07,173
high-level EQ

278
00:10:07,585 --> 00:10:08,833
is mentally taxing.

279
00:10:09,225 --> 00:10:10,293
So the answer becomes clear,

280
00:10:10,664 --> 00:10:11,953
split into two halves.

281
00:10:12,424 --> 00:10:16,333
The intuitive, reactive layer of EQ—for example,

282
00:10:16,504 --> 00:10:19,903
hyper-sensitive detection of anger or danger—

283
00:10:19,904 --> 00:10:22,193
can be roughly forged by one's environment,

284
00:10:22,225 --> 00:10:24,433
even if their intelligence isn't very high.

285
00:10:24,664 --> 00:10:27,793
Because it's perceptual and almost automatic,

286
00:10:27,865 --> 00:10:30,943
the children in Pollak's study possessed this

287
00:10:30,945 --> 00:10:32,433
without needing a high IQ.

288
00:10:32,745 --> 00:10:35,894
But the strategic, calculating layer of high-level EQ—

289
00:10:36,225 --> 00:10:38,344
understanding complex social unwritten rules,

290
00:10:38,345 --> 00:10:42,104
picking the optimal response calmly after empathizing,

291
00:10:42,105 --> 00:10:44,953
anticipating several steps ahead—this layer

292
00:10:44,985 --> 00:10:46,994
requires cognitive bandwidth to sustain.

293
00:10:47,264 --> 00:10:50,234
Environmental pressure alone won't force it out.

294
00:10:50,705 --> 00:10:52,014
Let me paint two pictures

295
00:10:52,304 --> 00:10:53,313
and you'll understand.

296
00:10:53,544 --> 00:10:54,583
A child,

297
00:10:54,585 --> 00:10:57,153
the moment their mother slams the door,

298
00:10:57,225 --> 00:10:59,024
can tell from the weight of her footsteps

299
00:10:59,024 --> 00:11:03,073
exactly whether to speak or not. This is radar.

300
00:11:03,184 --> 00:11:06,024
It's a perceptual, lightning-fast reaction.

301
00:11:06,024 --> 00:11:07,793
It doesn't require a high IQ;

302
00:11:07,825 --> 00:11:09,953
enough environmental pressure can install it.

303
00:11:10,664 --> 00:11:13,423
But here is the other picture: at a complex dinner party,

304
00:11:13,424 --> 00:11:16,624
you need to read the motives of three or four people at once,

305
00:11:16,625 --> 00:11:19,614
gauging who can't lose face or who's being sarcastic,

306
00:11:19,945 --> 00:11:23,583
and what chain reaction your next sentence will trigger.

307
00:11:23,585 --> 00:11:25,903
Then, based on all these calculations,

308
00:11:25,904 --> 00:11:27,333
you pick a response that gets things done

309
00:11:27,544 --> 00:11:30,114
without offending anyone. This is a chess player.

310
00:11:30,184 --> 00:11:31,624
This step-by-step reasoning

311
00:11:31,625 --> 00:11:33,474
is genuinely mentally demanding.

312
00:11:33,865 --> 00:11:35,014
So, I want to use one sentence

313
00:11:35,225 --> 00:11:37,585
to answer my friend: context

314
00:11:37,585 --> 00:11:40,374
can force someone to become a precise emotional radar,

315
00:11:40,825 --> 00:11:41,793
but context

316
00:11:41,825 --> 00:11:45,234
won't necessarily force them to be a brilliant emotional chess player.

317
00:11:45,625 --> 00:11:46,014
Radar

318
00:11:46,345 --> 00:11:48,214
is for scanning and warnings,

319
00:11:48,544 --> 00:11:49,214
while the chess player

320
00:11:49,504 --> 00:11:51,474
must see the whole board before acting.

321
00:11:51,544 --> 00:11:52,953
to make their moves calmly.

322
00:11:53,105 --> 00:11:54,793
Someone who lacks the necessary cognitive depth

323
00:11:54,825 --> 00:11:57,433
might develop a sensitive radar due to adversity;

324
00:11:57,585 --> 00:11:58,494
that is entirely possible.

325
00:11:58,985 --> 00:11:59,974
But to become a true chess player,

326
00:12:00,384 --> 00:12:02,313
pressure alone isn't enough.

327
00:12:02,384 --> 00:12:05,673
You also need the intellect to calculate the game.

328
00:12:06,188 --> 00:12:06,985
Speaking of which,

329
00:12:06,985 --> 00:12:10,394
this connects to the talent and character we discussed before.

330
00:12:10,745 --> 00:12:13,033
The person someone eventually becomes

331
00:12:13,065 --> 00:12:15,354
is never determined by genes alone,

332
00:12:15,465 --> 00:12:17,394
nor by environment alone.

333
00:12:17,585 --> 00:12:19,274
It is the hand of cards nature dealt you,

334
00:12:19,384 --> 00:12:21,504
rubbed and folded repeatedly

335
00:12:21,504 --> 00:12:24,264
throughout a unique life,

336
00:12:24,264 --> 00:12:25,714
that creates the final shape.

337
00:12:26,144 --> 00:12:26,774
So you see,

338
00:12:27,184 --> 00:12:28,464
my friend's theory

339
00:12:28,465 --> 00:12:29,514
was mostly correct.

340
00:12:29,945 --> 00:12:32,114
Children lacking love and security

341
00:12:32,144 --> 00:12:34,953
may indeed develop a skill for reading people.

342
00:12:35,065 --> 00:12:37,114
There is solid science behind this.

343
00:12:37,384 --> 00:12:38,293
But this skill

344
00:12:38,504 --> 00:12:40,553
is like a callus formed over a wound.

345
00:12:40,745 --> 00:12:41,693
It has its sharpness,

346
00:12:41,945 --> 00:12:44,073
but also its pain and limitations.

347
00:12:44,625 --> 00:12:45,594
Thinking about this,

348
00:12:45,664 --> 00:12:48,433
a more haunting question comes to mind.

349
00:12:48,784 --> 00:12:49,854
I can't answer it today,

350
00:12:50,144 --> 00:12:51,114
so I'll leave it to you.

351
00:12:51,304 --> 00:12:52,943
If someone's high EQ

352
00:12:52,945 --> 00:12:57,144
is truly a callus grown from childhood trauma,

353
00:12:57,144 --> 00:12:59,953
then as they heal and find security,

354
00:13:00,184 --> 00:13:02,504
will they gradually

355
00:13:02,504 --> 00:13:03,453
lose that hard-won ability?

356
00:13:03,985 --> 00:13:04,494
Or perhaps,

357
00:13:04,865 --> 00:13:06,073
true maturity is taking that radar

358
00:13:06,105 --> 00:13:09,793
that once scanned others for survival

359
00:13:09,904 --> 00:13:10,494
and slowly

360
00:13:10,745 --> 00:13:13,234
replacing it with the internal capacity

361
00:13:13,264 --> 00:13:16,333
to truly and calmly see others.

362
00:13:17,065 --> 00:13:18,173
From scanning for threats

363
00:13:18,424 --> 00:13:19,714
to actually seeing the person—

364
00:13:20,465 --> 00:13:21,744
the distance between the two

365
00:13:21,745 --> 00:13:24,073
might be a lifelong journey.

366
00:13:24,384 --> 00:13:25,014
What about you?

367
00:13:25,504 --> 00:13:27,783
Among the skills people admire in you,

368
00:13:27,784 --> 00:13:28,903
are there any that,

369
00:13:28,904 --> 00:13:29,913
looking back,

370
00:13:29,985 --> 00:13:32,663
were actually forced out of you

371
00:13:32,664 --> 00:13:33,413
during a moment of survival?

372
00:13:34,225 --> 00:13:34,894
In the comments below,

373
00:13:35,144 --> 00:13:37,153
I would love to hear your story.

374
00:13:37,504 --> 00:13:38,173
I am Wang Lijie.

375
00:13:38,544 --> 00:13:39,500
See you next time.