1 00:00:00,265 --> 00:00:02,474 After Jack Dorsey cut half of his staff 2 00:00:02,504 --> 00:00:04,174 the company stock jumped 25% 3 00:00:05,264 --> 00:00:07,434 On February 26 2026 4 00:00:07,544 --> 00:00:09,874 one tweet blew up Silicon Valley 5 00:00:10,185 --> 00:00:10,933 Jack Dorsey 6 00:00:11,185 --> 00:00:12,624 co-founder of Twitter 7 00:00:12,625 --> 00:00:14,593 now CEO of Block 8 00:00:14,744 --> 00:00:16,314 posted a message himself 9 00:00:16,464 --> 00:00:18,173 with just one core piece of news 10 00:00:18,545 --> 00:00:21,873 Today we are making the hardest decision in the history of this company 11 00:00:21,945 --> 00:00:23,614 cutting the organization from over ten thousand people 12 00:00:23,864 --> 00:00:25,474 down to under six thousand 13 00:00:25,625 --> 00:00:26,574 More than four thousand people 14 00:00:26,745 --> 00:00:28,193 are leaving starting today 15 00:00:28,988 --> 00:00:30,357 What was even more explosive was the reason 16 00:00:30,627 --> 00:00:32,377 He did not say the macro economy was bad 17 00:00:32,547 --> 00:00:34,796 or the market was down and we need to cut costs 18 00:00:34,948 --> 00:00:35,916 What he said was 19 00:00:36,068 --> 00:00:39,476 AI capability made a leap at the end of 2025 20 00:00:39,668 --> 00:00:42,916 and we believe this company can no longer stay the size it was 21 00:00:43,348 --> 00:00:44,597 The day the news broke 22 00:00:44,668 --> 00:00:46,736 Block stock jumped 25% in after hours trading 23 00:00:48,071 --> 00:00:48,381 Hello 24 00:00:48,751 --> 00:00:49,220 everyone 25 00:00:49,471 --> 00:00:50,520 I am Leo Wang 26 00:00:50,711 --> 00:00:51,620 Have you ever wondered 27 00:00:51,992 --> 00:00:53,720 why cutting half the staff 28 00:00:53,751 --> 00:00:55,340 made Wall Street applaud like crazy 29 00:00:56,031 --> 00:00:57,510 The underlying logic here 30 00:00:57,511 --> 00:01:00,400 goes far deeper than the headline you saw 31 00:01:00,711 --> 00:01:03,840 Today I do not want to just retell a layoff story 32 00:01:03,952 --> 00:01:06,001 I want to show you three things 33 00:01:06,192 --> 00:01:06,540 First 34 00:01:06,912 --> 00:01:08,910 what exactly is Jack Dorsey doing 35 00:01:08,912 --> 00:01:10,641 what is he turning this company into 36 00:01:10,711 --> 00:01:11,061 Second 37 00:01:11,352 --> 00:01:13,320 how he thought his way to this decision 38 00:01:13,431 --> 00:01:16,240 why he had to act while the company was still making money 39 00:01:16,431 --> 00:01:16,781 Third 40 00:01:17,071 --> 00:01:18,751 and this is what I most want to talk about 41 00:01:18,752 --> 00:01:21,880 what this means for every single person who goes to work 42 00:01:22,270 --> 00:01:23,359 Let me start with the first question 43 00:01:23,790 --> 00:01:26,478 What exactly does Jack Dorsey want this company to become 44 00:01:26,829 --> 00:01:27,948 A month after the layoffs 45 00:01:27,949 --> 00:01:31,148 he and Sequoia Capital partner Roelof Botha 46 00:01:31,150 --> 00:01:32,838 co-published an essay 47 00:01:32,949 --> 00:01:35,219 titled From Hierarchy to Intelligence 48 00:01:35,749 --> 00:01:38,238 The core argument of that piece is extremely radical 49 00:01:38,469 --> 00:01:38,818 He says 50 00:01:39,109 --> 00:01:41,269 humans invented the corporate hierarchy 51 00:01:41,270 --> 00:01:42,799 two thousand years ago 52 00:01:43,029 --> 00:01:44,299 starting with the Roman legions 53 00:01:44,589 --> 00:01:46,068 a centurion managed ten men 54 00:01:46,070 --> 00:01:47,178 a general managed the centurions 55 00:01:47,430 --> 00:01:48,719 the emperor managed the generals 56 00:01:49,821 --> 00:01:51,290 What is this structure really 57 00:01:51,782 --> 00:01:53,031 It is information routing 58 00:01:53,382 --> 00:01:56,550 In a system too big for one person to see 59 00:01:56,582 --> 00:01:58,690 you need middle layers to pass information along 60 00:01:59,022 --> 00:02:01,990 pre-process decisions and keep everyone aligned 61 00:02:02,382 --> 00:02:03,430 For two thousand years 62 00:02:03,502 --> 00:02:05,751 the material of this structure never changed 63 00:02:05,805 --> 00:02:06,606 It was people 64 00:02:07,022 --> 00:02:08,011 people passing along messages 65 00:02:08,461 --> 00:02:09,670 people writing reports 66 00:02:09,701 --> 00:02:11,350 people sitting in meetings to align 67 00:02:11,662 --> 00:02:12,510 The problem is 68 00:02:12,622 --> 00:02:15,670 people as a material have a serious bandwidth bottleneck 69 00:02:16,582 --> 00:02:18,430 Every management layer you add 70 00:02:18,462 --> 00:02:20,271 distorts the information one more time 71 00:02:20,501 --> 00:02:21,731 Every extra meeting you hold 72 00:02:22,061 --> 00:02:23,990 delays the decision one more round 73 00:02:24,302 --> 00:02:26,180 Once a company passes a few hundred people 74 00:02:26,182 --> 00:02:28,551 a strange thing starts to happen 75 00:02:28,821 --> 00:02:29,810 Everybody is busy 76 00:02:30,101 --> 00:02:31,990 but the company as a whole gets slower 77 00:02:32,022 --> 00:02:32,530 At the end of the day 78 00:02:32,781 --> 00:02:34,111 this is not a management problem 79 00:02:34,221 --> 00:02:35,630 this is a materials problem 80 00:02:36,101 --> 00:02:37,780 It is like building a house out of wood 81 00:02:37,781 --> 00:02:39,671 six or seven floors is the limit 82 00:02:39,902 --> 00:02:41,910 not because the architect is not smart enough 83 00:02:41,982 --> 00:02:44,710 but because wood cannot carry any more weight 84 00:02:45,145 --> 00:02:46,875 Now AI has arrived 85 00:02:46,946 --> 00:02:50,715 It can pull together all of a company information around the clock 86 00:02:50,865 --> 00:02:52,895 Slack messages code commits 87 00:02:53,145 --> 00:02:56,034 customer feedback financial data meeting notes 88 00:02:56,145 --> 00:02:57,984 and then on top of all that information 89 00:02:57,985 --> 00:03:00,835 build what he calls an intelligence layer 90 00:03:01,265 --> 00:03:02,465 Any single employee 91 00:03:02,466 --> 00:03:05,034 can ask that intelligence layer a question directly 92 00:03:05,066 --> 00:03:08,354 and get all the context they need to make a decision 93 00:03:08,825 --> 00:03:10,254 Do you know what that means 94 00:03:11,066 --> 00:03:14,794 All those middle managers who passed messages wrote reports and ran alignment 95 00:03:14,825 --> 00:03:17,155 their core function has been replaced 96 00:03:17,746 --> 00:03:19,354 It is not that they are not smart enough 97 00:03:19,425 --> 00:03:20,954 it is not that they do not work hard enough 98 00:03:21,066 --> 00:03:24,514 it is that the function they carried information routing 99 00:03:24,666 --> 00:03:28,595 got taken over by a new material orders of magnitude more efficient 100 00:03:29,194 --> 00:03:32,882 So Jack Dorsey compressed the company into three roles 101 00:03:32,994 --> 00:03:35,002 The first is the individual contributor 102 00:03:35,073 --> 00:03:36,762 the people who actually do the work 103 00:03:36,793 --> 00:03:39,762 writing code doing design running sales 104 00:03:39,914 --> 00:03:42,042 With AI agents backing them up 105 00:03:42,194 --> 00:03:45,922 one person can now do what used to take a team or even ten people 106 00:03:46,353 --> 00:03:48,222 The second is the directly responsible individual 107 00:03:48,633 --> 00:03:49,672 They do not manage people 108 00:03:49,673 --> 00:03:51,042 they only own outcomes 109 00:03:51,233 --> 00:03:52,542 understand what the customer needs 110 00:03:52,714 --> 00:03:53,912 break it into tasks 111 00:03:53,914 --> 00:03:55,243 and make sure it gets done 112 00:03:56,146 --> 00:03:57,774 The third is the player coach 113 00:03:58,146 --> 00:03:58,744 Note 114 00:03:58,746 --> 00:04:00,554 this is not a manager in the traditional sense 115 00:04:00,746 --> 00:04:02,154 They are on the field playing themselves 116 00:04:02,225 --> 00:04:03,955 while helping teammates get stronger 117 00:04:04,306 --> 00:04:06,865 This relationship is not a permanent reporting line 118 00:04:06,866 --> 00:04:08,834 it is a temporary enablement relationship 119 00:04:09,146 --> 00:04:10,054 Today I help you 120 00:04:10,266 --> 00:04:11,714 tomorrow you help someone else 121 00:04:11,905 --> 00:04:13,994 The shape of the whole company changed too 122 00:04:14,105 --> 00:04:15,135 It is no longer a pyramid 123 00:04:15,345 --> 00:04:16,395 it is a circle 124 00:04:16,866 --> 00:04:17,774 AI sits at the center 125 00:04:18,105 --> 00:04:19,235 people sit around the edge 126 00:04:19,545 --> 00:04:21,944 Human work is no longer passing information 127 00:04:21,946 --> 00:04:23,314 it is calibrating the system 128 00:04:23,466 --> 00:04:26,874 taking human judgment values and understanding of customers 129 00:04:26,946 --> 00:04:29,235 and feeding it continuously into the intelligence layer at the center 130 00:04:29,913 --> 00:04:31,072 You might say 131 00:04:31,072 --> 00:04:33,462 is this just another Silicon Valley CEO selling a dream 132 00:04:33,993 --> 00:04:35,952 I talked before about the Notion founder 133 00:04:35,952 --> 00:04:37,481 Ivan Zhao and his essay 134 00:04:37,632 --> 00:04:39,762 He used steel and the steam engine as a metaphor 135 00:04:39,832 --> 00:04:42,402 saying we are still stuffing AI into an old house 136 00:04:42,553 --> 00:04:44,642 But what makes Jack Dorsey different 137 00:04:44,673 --> 00:04:46,231 is that he is not just writing essays 138 00:04:46,233 --> 00:04:49,082 he actually cut half of his own company 139 00:04:49,233 --> 00:04:50,632 This is not a thought experiment 140 00:04:50,632 --> 00:04:52,801 this is going all in with real money 141 00:04:53,018 --> 00:04:55,866 And he has one argument especially worth noting 142 00:04:55,977 --> 00:04:56,326 He says 143 00:04:56,737 --> 00:04:58,347 the biggest bottleneck at a company 144 00:04:58,378 --> 00:05:00,746 is actually its own product roadmap 145 00:05:01,241 --> 00:05:01,686 What does that mean 146 00:05:02,498 --> 00:05:04,987 A traditional company works like this 147 00:05:05,097 --> 00:05:06,987 product managers do user research 148 00:05:07,097 --> 00:05:07,967 write requirement docs 149 00:05:08,217 --> 00:05:09,186 rank priorities 150 00:05:09,338 --> 00:05:12,066 and then engineers build step by step along the roadmap 151 00:05:12,537 --> 00:05:13,537 But the problem is 152 00:05:13,537 --> 00:05:16,467 a roadmap is essentially your assumption about the world 153 00:05:16,977 --> 00:05:18,737 You assume what users want 154 00:05:18,737 --> 00:05:20,866 and then you build according to that assumption 155 00:05:21,706 --> 00:05:22,535 Jack Dorsey says 156 00:05:22,826 --> 00:05:23,864 in the AI era 157 00:05:23,866 --> 00:05:25,554 this flow should run in reverse 158 00:05:25,665 --> 00:05:27,475 Users state what they need directly 159 00:05:27,506 --> 00:05:30,395 the system calls on existing capabilities in real time to meet it 160 00:05:30,506 --> 00:05:31,455 and if it cannot 161 00:05:31,706 --> 00:05:33,105 that gap it could not fill 162 00:05:33,105 --> 00:05:35,835 automatically becomes the next thing to build 163 00:05:35,946 --> 00:05:38,064 The roadmap is not planned out 164 00:05:38,066 --> 00:05:39,874 it is forced out of you by users 165 00:05:40,625 --> 00:05:43,993 Block has one unique advantage here 166 00:05:44,145 --> 00:05:46,873 It owns both Cash App and Square 167 00:05:47,025 --> 00:05:51,914 which means it sees transaction data from both buyers and sellers 168 00:05:52,265 --> 00:05:56,313 Millions of real payments flow through its system every day 169 00:05:56,825 --> 00:05:59,513 Jack Dorsey said something really sharp 170 00:05:59,904 --> 00:06:02,594 Money is the most honest signal in the world 171 00:06:02,904 --> 00:06:07,224 What you say on social media what you write on a survey 172 00:06:07,224 --> 00:06:08,553 could all be fake 173 00:06:08,825 --> 00:06:10,503 but where your money goes 174 00:06:10,505 --> 00:06:12,114 that signal cannot lie 175 00:06:12,825 --> 00:06:16,474 When you plug that dense real signal into an AI intelligence layer 176 00:06:16,505 --> 00:06:19,274 your company stops being an execution machine 177 00:06:19,344 --> 00:06:23,553 and becomes an agent that senses adapts and evolves on its own 178 00:06:23,705 --> 00:06:26,393 That is why the episode of their podcast was titled 179 00:06:26,465 --> 00:06:29,654 every company can now become a mini AGI 180 00:06:30,965 --> 00:06:31,154 Alright 181 00:06:31,404 --> 00:06:32,813 now to the second question 182 00:06:32,965 --> 00:06:35,373 and the part I find most worth thinking about 183 00:06:35,565 --> 00:06:39,013 How did Jack Dorsey talk himself into swinging this axe 184 00:06:39,404 --> 00:06:42,614 On the podcast he broke down his own thinking in detail 185 00:06:43,044 --> 00:06:46,094 He says he ran a very cold reverse calculation 186 00:06:46,409 --> 00:06:47,209 Step one 187 00:06:47,284 --> 00:06:50,493 to keep the existing business running at one hundred percent 188 00:06:50,604 --> 00:06:51,974 what is the minimum headcount 189 00:06:52,325 --> 00:06:52,834 Step two 190 00:06:53,205 --> 00:06:55,893 to meet every regulatory and compliance requirement 191 00:06:55,924 --> 00:06:57,334 what is the minimum headcount 192 00:06:57,924 --> 00:06:58,474 Step three 193 00:06:58,804 --> 00:06:59,964 on top of that 194 00:06:59,965 --> 00:07:04,493 to keep growing and rebuild the company as an agent 195 00:07:04,604 --> 00:07:05,654 how many people do you need 196 00:07:06,044 --> 00:07:07,553 Stack those three conditions together 197 00:07:07,885 --> 00:07:09,164 and the number you get 198 00:07:09,164 --> 00:07:10,373 is six thousand people 199 00:07:10,895 --> 00:07:11,285 But 200 00:07:11,576 --> 00:07:13,104 inside that calculation 201 00:07:13,136 --> 00:07:15,984 one judgment mattered more than how many people to cut 202 00:07:16,376 --> 00:07:17,124 He said something 203 00:07:17,616 --> 00:07:18,465 that roughly means 204 00:07:18,616 --> 00:07:21,984 you must restructure by choice from a position of strength 205 00:07:22,056 --> 00:07:25,104 not shrink by force from a position of weakness 206 00:07:25,936 --> 00:07:26,845 The weight of that sentence 207 00:07:27,095 --> 00:07:28,304 is worth sitting with 208 00:07:28,696 --> 00:07:31,225 You have seen how too many companies die 209 00:07:31,576 --> 00:07:32,725 They do not die all at once 210 00:07:33,016 --> 00:07:34,544 they get worn down slowly 211 00:07:34,816 --> 00:07:36,044 Cut ten percent this year 212 00:07:36,496 --> 00:07:38,265 cut twenty percent next year 213 00:07:38,455 --> 00:07:40,564 every round of layoffs is passive defense 214 00:07:40,855 --> 00:07:41,814 no direction 215 00:07:41,816 --> 00:07:42,645 no creativity 216 00:07:43,016 --> 00:07:44,785 just endless shrinking 217 00:07:45,295 --> 00:07:46,645 Employees live in fear 218 00:07:47,056 --> 00:07:48,944 the best people leave first 219 00:07:49,016 --> 00:07:51,424 and whoever stays coasts and waits for the next round 220 00:07:51,816 --> 00:07:53,004 That kind of slow death 221 00:07:53,215 --> 00:07:55,465 hurts more than cutting off an arm in one go 222 00:07:56,145 --> 00:07:58,754 Jack Dorsey chose the opposite path 223 00:07:59,145 --> 00:08:02,033 He moved while Block revenue was still growing 224 00:08:02,504 --> 00:08:04,314 In the fourth quarter of 2025 225 00:08:04,384 --> 00:08:06,953 the company posted revenue of six point two five billion dollars 226 00:08:07,145 --> 00:08:09,134 with gross profit up 24% year over year 227 00:08:09,985 --> 00:08:12,913 and it raised its full year guidance for 2026 228 00:08:13,504 --> 00:08:16,754 This is not a dying company fighting to survive 229 00:08:16,985 --> 00:08:20,473 this is a profitable company choosing to overthrow itself 230 00:08:21,105 --> 00:08:23,554 He says the whole decision took less than three weeks 231 00:08:23,744 --> 00:08:28,554 the team debated ran scenarios fast and kept correcting assumptions 232 00:08:28,785 --> 00:08:30,333 The board not only did not block it 233 00:08:30,704 --> 00:08:32,153 they strongly supported it 234 00:08:32,345 --> 00:08:32,853 Why 235 00:08:33,785 --> 00:08:36,103 Because the whole chain of logic was clear 236 00:08:36,105 --> 00:08:40,154 principles reasoning and a verifiable picture of the future 237 00:08:40,573 --> 00:08:43,741 On the podcast he also shared a very personal reflection 238 00:08:44,132 --> 00:08:45,932 He says he once made a big mistake 239 00:08:45,933 --> 00:08:47,302 over delegating 240 00:08:47,533 --> 00:08:50,462 He split Block into separate business units 241 00:08:50,573 --> 00:08:51,722 one leader for Square 242 00:08:52,053 --> 00:08:53,861 one leader for Cash App 243 00:08:53,972 --> 00:08:55,981 trying to run a multi CEO structure 244 00:08:56,132 --> 00:08:59,062 The result was a loose holding company 245 00:08:59,092 --> 00:09:02,462 split culture mismatched rhythm broken execution 246 00:09:02,972 --> 00:09:05,101 What he learned from that lesson was this 247 00:09:05,212 --> 00:09:07,741 before a company truly becomes an agent 248 00:09:07,813 --> 00:09:10,381 over delegating actually makes the system lose control 249 00:09:10,653 --> 00:09:12,202 You have to build the center first 250 00:09:12,573 --> 00:09:13,621 before you can let go 251 00:09:13,926 --> 00:09:16,855 He told another story that really moved me 252 00:09:17,326 --> 00:09:19,815 He said when Cash App first started 253 00:09:19,967 --> 00:09:21,656 almost everyone was against it 254 00:09:22,007 --> 00:09:22,955 the board did not understand it 255 00:09:23,326 --> 00:09:24,695 the internal team did not buy it 256 00:09:25,046 --> 00:09:26,075 Every day he held the line 257 00:09:26,487 --> 00:09:28,335 he was burning his own credibility 258 00:09:28,727 --> 00:09:29,975 But he said this 259 00:09:30,166 --> 00:09:32,975 every company has multiple founding moments 260 00:09:33,367 --> 00:09:35,256 not just the one at the very beginning 261 00:09:35,647 --> 00:09:39,416 Every time you make a key choice that goes against everyone instincts 262 00:09:39,527 --> 00:09:41,935 you are redefining that company 263 00:09:42,406 --> 00:09:45,215 That is how he can do something very counterintuitive 264 00:09:45,527 --> 00:09:47,616 accept losing trust in the short term 265 00:09:47,686 --> 00:09:49,416 to buy being right in the long term 266 00:09:49,847 --> 00:09:52,416 The condition is that you know why you are doing it 267 00:09:52,527 --> 00:09:55,095 and you know how you will win it back later 268 00:09:56,293 --> 00:09:58,743 He even sums that ability up in one phrase 269 00:09:58,893 --> 00:10:01,263 not being held hostage by outside opinion 270 00:10:01,893 --> 00:10:02,562 But he stresses 271 00:10:02,854 --> 00:10:04,332 this is not blind confidence 272 00:10:04,334 --> 00:10:06,263 it is conviction grounded in principles 273 00:10:06,854 --> 00:10:07,483 At this point 274 00:10:07,773 --> 00:10:09,662 Roelof Botha added one more cut 275 00:10:10,133 --> 00:10:13,223 He said a good CEO needs three core qualities 276 00:10:13,374 --> 00:10:15,702 authenticity rationality and empathy 277 00:10:16,013 --> 00:10:17,042 but in the AI era 278 00:10:17,334 --> 00:10:18,123 you have to add one more 279 00:10:18,574 --> 00:10:19,263 speed 280 00:10:19,734 --> 00:10:20,962 because change is moving too fast 281 00:10:21,254 --> 00:10:22,373 Hesitate for six months 282 00:10:22,374 --> 00:10:24,503 and you might miss an entire generation of opportunity 283 00:10:24,744 --> 00:10:27,263 Then Jack Dorsey said something really interesting 284 00:10:27,264 --> 00:10:30,672 He said most people treat AI as an output tool 285 00:10:30,744 --> 00:10:33,753 having it write your copy your code your designs 286 00:10:33,783 --> 00:10:35,353 but that gets it completely backwards 287 00:10:35,584 --> 00:10:37,993 The more important value of AI is input enhancement 288 00:10:38,183 --> 00:10:39,212 not helping you produce 289 00:10:39,464 --> 00:10:41,182 but giving you better information 290 00:10:41,183 --> 00:10:42,753 so you can make better judgments 291 00:10:42,943 --> 00:10:44,432 He says for a full year 292 00:10:44,504 --> 00:10:47,113 he spent three hours every morning on one thing 293 00:10:47,224 --> 00:10:49,832 feeding the output of various AI tools to himself 294 00:10:50,023 --> 00:10:52,033 not letting AI make decisions for him 295 00:10:52,063 --> 00:10:55,182 but using AI to give himself more complete context 296 00:10:55,183 --> 00:10:56,753 and then deciding himself 297 00:10:57,681 --> 00:10:59,491 The logic behind this is 298 00:10:59,561 --> 00:11:01,281 in an environment of information overload 299 00:11:01,281 --> 00:11:03,600 what is truly scarce is not the ability to produce 300 00:11:03,602 --> 00:11:05,970 it is something he calls taste 301 00:11:06,482 --> 00:11:08,001 Jack Dorsey stresses 302 00:11:08,002 --> 00:11:10,491 this taste is not about whether something looks good 303 00:11:10,521 --> 00:11:11,810 it is three things 304 00:11:12,161 --> 00:11:14,131 do you have a clear direction 305 00:11:14,561 --> 00:11:16,891 are you willing to push it obsessively 306 00:11:17,321 --> 00:11:20,771 and is it actually more to the point than what already exists 307 00:11:21,205 --> 00:11:21,962 He says 308 00:11:21,962 --> 00:11:26,131 the problem now is too many companies are making copies of copies of copies 309 00:11:26,561 --> 00:11:29,251 because AI made copying too easy 310 00:11:29,281 --> 00:11:30,891 templatization happens too fast 311 00:11:31,321 --> 00:11:32,310 What is truly scarce 312 00:11:32,482 --> 00:11:33,350 is no longer capability 313 00:11:33,561 --> 00:11:34,611 it is a point of view 314 00:11:35,267 --> 00:11:37,835 The way people work inside Block changed too 315 00:11:37,987 --> 00:11:41,916 Meetings used to mean bringing slides docs and ideas 316 00:11:42,066 --> 00:11:44,355 now everyone brings a prototype 317 00:11:44,507 --> 00:11:47,195 that can be changed discussed and tested on the spot 318 00:11:47,387 --> 00:11:49,186 Decisions are no longer based on descriptions 319 00:11:49,186 --> 00:11:51,475 but on something real you can actually use 320 00:11:51,867 --> 00:11:54,676 Jack Dorsey says this brought one fundamental change 321 00:11:54,826 --> 00:11:56,436 They used to preach focus 322 00:11:56,466 --> 00:11:58,075 do one thing at a time 323 00:11:58,186 --> 00:12:00,796 now you can explore several directions at once 324 00:12:00,907 --> 00:12:03,315 because the cost of trying has dropped to almost zero 325 00:12:03,426 --> 00:12:05,995 A prototype takes an hour to build 326 00:12:06,535 --> 00:12:07,863 But then he turns around and says 327 00:12:08,015 --> 00:12:10,383 one thing has actually become more important 328 00:12:10,574 --> 00:12:12,503 that last twenty percent 329 00:12:12,935 --> 00:12:15,343 judgment taste creativity 330 00:12:15,574 --> 00:12:18,424 AI can get you through the first eighty percent 331 00:12:18,535 --> 00:12:22,064 but what really decides whether this is right and worth doing 332 00:12:22,135 --> 00:12:23,023 is still a human 333 00:12:23,857 --> 00:12:24,046 Alright 334 00:12:24,497 --> 00:12:26,107 time for the third question 335 00:12:26,218 --> 00:12:28,067 what does this have to do with you 336 00:12:28,377 --> 00:12:30,746 Let me start with an uncomfortable fact 337 00:12:31,017 --> 00:12:33,227 The day Block announced the layoffs 338 00:12:33,338 --> 00:12:37,906 Wall Street voted yes with a 25% after hours jump 339 00:12:38,257 --> 00:12:40,046 Right after that Fortune CNN 340 00:12:40,578 --> 00:12:41,867 and Bloomberg all reported it 341 00:12:41,897 --> 00:12:44,386 and nearly all of them quoted one line from Jack Dorsey 342 00:12:44,497 --> 00:12:45,166 He said at the time 343 00:12:45,458 --> 00:12:46,496 within a year 344 00:12:46,497 --> 00:12:49,827 most companies will end up where Block is 345 00:12:50,097 --> 00:12:51,227 That is not a threat 346 00:12:51,257 --> 00:12:53,467 that is a trend already unfolding 347 00:12:53,821 --> 00:12:54,411 Think about it 348 00:12:54,901 --> 00:12:57,550 if you were the CEO of a public company 349 00:12:57,781 --> 00:13:00,310 and you saw Block cut half its people 350 00:13:00,462 --> 00:13:01,790 with the business not collapsing 351 00:13:01,821 --> 00:13:02,930 and the stock jumping 352 00:13:03,382 --> 00:13:04,210 what would you think 353 00:13:04,742 --> 00:13:06,411 What would your board think 354 00:13:06,862 --> 00:13:08,651 What would your investors think 355 00:13:09,382 --> 00:13:11,131 And what do Block employees say 356 00:13:11,781 --> 00:13:14,430 Some reports quoted people inside 357 00:13:14,622 --> 00:13:17,070 saying morale might be the lowest in four years 358 00:13:17,342 --> 00:13:19,710 Someone said flat out at an all hands 359 00:13:19,982 --> 00:13:23,950 that being forced to use large language models is insane 360 00:13:24,622 --> 00:13:27,670 Current and laid off employees also told The Guardian 361 00:13:27,901 --> 00:13:32,190 that about 95% of AI generated code still needs human fixes 362 00:13:32,382 --> 00:13:35,590 and in heavily regulated areas like banking and payments 363 00:13:35,661 --> 00:13:37,991 AI simply cannot stand on its own yet 364 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,109 Do these criticisms mean Jack Dorsey is wrong 365 00:13:41,563 --> 00:13:42,364 Not necessarily 366 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:44,129 What these criticisms show 367 00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:48,048 is that what he is doing sits in an extremely painful middle zone 368 00:13:48,399 --> 00:13:50,209 The old structure is already coming down 369 00:13:50,360 --> 00:13:52,489 the new one is not fully standing yet 370 00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:55,768 and everyone is paying the cost of that transition 371 00:13:56,560 --> 00:13:57,808 But think about it 372 00:13:57,919 --> 00:13:59,989 which paradigm shift was ever any different 373 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:03,568 The day factories moved the steam engine away from the river 374 00:14:03,759 --> 00:14:06,288 the water wheel repairmen of course felt the sky was falling 375 00:14:06,680 --> 00:14:10,249 but history does not wait for everyone to be ready before it turns 376 00:14:11,034 --> 00:14:12,363 As an investor 377 00:14:12,434 --> 00:14:14,803 I look at this from a very personal angle 378 00:14:15,273 --> 00:14:16,353 Over the past decade or so 379 00:14:16,353 --> 00:14:18,282 I have invested in more than three hundred early stage companies 380 00:14:18,674 --> 00:14:21,002 I have seen the cost structure of too many teams 381 00:14:21,353 --> 00:14:23,073 For a twenty person startup 382 00:14:23,074 --> 00:14:25,603 sixty to seventy percent of costs are people 383 00:14:26,074 --> 00:14:29,162 If AI really lets one person do the work of ten 384 00:14:29,233 --> 00:14:30,063 what does that mean 385 00:14:30,674 --> 00:14:33,032 It means you might only need two or three people 386 00:14:33,034 --> 00:14:35,282 to build what used to take twenty 387 00:14:35,954 --> 00:14:38,083 The barrier to starting a company is dropping fast 388 00:14:38,233 --> 00:14:40,762 but the bar for each individual is rising fast 389 00:14:41,665 --> 00:14:43,674 On the podcast Jack Dorsey brought up 390 00:14:43,825 --> 00:14:45,515 one especially important idea 391 00:14:45,530 --> 00:14:46,329 meditation 392 00:14:46,825 --> 00:14:48,954 He does not mean the mystical kind 393 00:14:49,185 --> 00:14:51,915 He says meditation is essentially training three things 394 00:14:52,106 --> 00:14:55,755 focus observation and the ability to not react immediately 395 00:14:55,986 --> 00:14:57,375 Translated into CEO language 396 00:14:57,746 --> 00:14:59,395 it means inside a complex system 397 00:14:59,425 --> 00:15:00,954 not getting carried off by the noise 398 00:15:01,305 --> 00:15:02,755 That made me think of something 399 00:15:03,025 --> 00:15:04,015 In the AI era 400 00:15:04,386 --> 00:15:06,834 your competitor is not AI itself 401 00:15:07,025 --> 00:15:09,594 it is the people who use AI better than you 402 00:15:09,923 --> 00:15:11,832 And what does using AI better depend on 403 00:15:12,284 --> 00:15:14,133 It depends on knowing what you want 404 00:15:14,443 --> 00:15:15,513 You need a direction first 405 00:15:15,884 --> 00:15:17,092 before tools are any use 406 00:15:17,484 --> 00:15:18,433 For someone with no direction 407 00:15:18,644 --> 00:15:19,883 the more powerful the tool 408 00:15:19,884 --> 00:15:20,893 the more lost they get 409 00:15:21,323 --> 00:15:22,592 This is really a consciousness problem 410 00:15:22,963 --> 00:15:24,092 not a technology problem 411 00:15:24,758 --> 00:15:26,907 Jack Dorsey did what everyone was thinking about 412 00:15:27,278 --> 00:15:28,887 but almost nobody dared to do 413 00:15:29,118 --> 00:15:31,086 He used action to test a hypothesis 414 00:15:31,358 --> 00:15:34,287 that the company of the future is not an organization that hires a lot of people 415 00:15:34,317 --> 00:15:35,907 but an intelligent system with AI at its core 416 00:15:36,278 --> 00:15:39,047 and human judgment at its edges 417 00:15:39,398 --> 00:15:40,427 Is that hypothesis right 418 00:15:40,878 --> 00:15:42,367 Time will answer that 419 00:15:42,837 --> 00:15:44,887 The quarterly reports after the layoffs 420 00:15:44,917 --> 00:15:47,486 will deliver the first batch of real data 421 00:15:47,758 --> 00:15:49,367 But whatever the result 422 00:15:49,518 --> 00:15:51,606 one thing is already irreversible 423 00:15:52,358 --> 00:15:55,086 Starting February 26 2026 424 00:15:55,197 --> 00:15:58,367 the question of what a company in the AI era should look like 425 00:15:58,718 --> 00:16:00,767 went from a vision slide in a deck 426 00:16:00,837 --> 00:16:03,767 to a real experiment that is actually running 427 00:16:04,226 --> 00:16:05,985 Jack Dorsey said it himself 428 00:16:05,985 --> 00:16:07,595 there is no Dorsey playbook 429 00:16:07,905 --> 00:16:09,995 this is not a proven answer 430 00:16:10,025 --> 00:16:11,995 this is a path still being explored 431 00:16:12,265 --> 00:16:13,674 But he said one more thing 432 00:16:13,865 --> 00:16:16,995 if I had to build a company from zero today 433 00:16:17,105 --> 00:16:19,674 I would not design it as an organization 434 00:16:19,706 --> 00:16:22,075 I would design it as an agent 435 00:16:22,426 --> 00:16:24,434 That line is worth chewing on again and again 436 00:16:24,745 --> 00:16:26,195 not because it must be right 437 00:16:26,226 --> 00:16:30,315 but because it might change the whole coordinate system you use to think about work 438 00:16:31,463 --> 00:16:32,932 The company you are in right now 439 00:16:33,344 --> 00:16:34,423 is it an organization 440 00:16:34,423 --> 00:16:35,452 or is it an agent 441 00:16:36,048 --> 00:16:36,847 And you yourself 442 00:16:37,104 --> 00:16:39,352 are you a node that an organization assigns tasks to 443 00:16:39,423 --> 00:16:42,493 or a standalone unit that talks to signals from the world directly 444 00:16:43,104 --> 00:16:44,312 The answer to that question 445 00:16:44,384 --> 00:16:47,352 might decide where you stand over the next five years 446 00:16:47,583 --> 00:16:48,373 I am Leo Wang 447 00:16:48,624 --> 00:16:49,514 see you next time