﻿1
00:00:00,427 --> 00:00:04,312
Your brain hides ten million bits of reality from you every second.

2
00:00:04,666 --> 00:00:07,152
Let me start with a real experiment.

3
00:00:07,506 --> 00:00:08,586
In 1999,

4
00:00:08,586 --> 00:00:11,471
the Harvard Psychology Department conducted a video test.

5
00:00:11,707 --> 00:00:14,432
A group of students were passing basketballs in a room.

6
00:00:14,627 --> 00:00:18,111
Researchers asked you to count the passes made by the team in white.

7
00:00:18,466 --> 00:00:19,632
Halfway through the video,

8
00:00:19,707 --> 00:00:23,551
a person in a gorilla suit walked right through the frame.

9
00:00:23,586 --> 00:00:24,852
They stopped in the middle,

10
00:00:25,106 --> 00:00:26,711
thumped their chest at the camera,

11
00:00:26,746 --> 00:00:28,472
stayed for nine full seconds,

12
00:00:28,547 --> 00:00:30,512
and then slowly walked out.

13
00:00:30,827 --> 00:00:31,652
After the video ended,

14
00:00:31,907 --> 00:00:33,265
researchers asked the audience,

15
00:00:33,267 --> 00:00:34,491
"Did you see the gorilla?"

16
00:00:34,947 --> 00:00:36,811
Nearly half of them earnestly replied,

17
00:00:37,146 --> 00:00:37,665
"No."

18
00:00:37,667 --> 00:00:38,712
"There was no gorilla."

19
00:00:38,826 --> 00:00:41,072
When researchers played the video back,

20
00:00:41,106 --> 00:00:42,706
those people were stunned.

21
00:00:42,707 --> 00:00:45,572
In the same video, they saw that massive gorilla

22
00:00:45,746 --> 00:00:47,951
thumping its chest right at them.

23
00:00:48,146 --> 00:00:49,991
They truly hadn't seen it before.

24
00:00:50,226 --> 00:00:50,531
Hello,

25
00:00:50,906 --> 00:00:51,411
everyone.

26
00:00:51,826 --> 00:00:52,871
I'm Wang Lijie.

27
00:00:53,267 --> 00:00:55,937
Today, we'll unpack a chilling topic.

28
00:00:55,947 --> 00:00:58,712
You think you're perceiving reality,

29
00:00:58,906 --> 00:01:01,692
but you're actually reading an internal briefing written by your brain,

30
00:01:01,987 --> 00:01:04,111
one that is heavily redacted.

31
00:01:04,507 --> 00:01:09,272
This briefing deletes over ten million bits of data every second.

32
00:01:09,427 --> 00:01:11,111
That's about one megabyte,

33
00:01:11,307 --> 00:01:16,432
roughly the size of a photo or half an MP3 song.

34
00:01:16,546 --> 00:01:20,712
It then presents less than fifty bits to you,

35
00:01:20,826 --> 00:01:21,331
telling you,

36
00:01:21,546 --> 00:01:22,371
"This is the truth."

37
00:01:22,746 --> 00:01:24,031
"This is the world."

38
00:01:24,346 --> 00:01:26,111
Let's look at the hard data first.

39
00:01:26,346 --> 00:01:29,992
Neuroscience and information theory have already calculated this.

40
00:01:30,227 --> 00:01:31,871
All your senses—

41
00:01:31,947 --> 00:01:35,512
eyes, ears, skin, nose, and tongue—

42
00:01:35,546 --> 00:01:38,585
send a raw stream of information to your brain every second

43
00:01:38,587 --> 00:01:40,792
of about eleven million bits.

44
00:01:41,106 --> 00:01:42,626
This isn't a guess.

45
00:01:42,626 --> 00:01:45,371
It's calculated from the nerve impulses fired by the retina,

46
00:01:45,746 --> 00:01:48,251
the vibration frequencies of tens of thousands of cilia in the cochlea,

47
00:01:48,587 --> 00:01:53,105
and the thousands of touch receptors in every square inch of skin.

48
00:01:53,106 --> 00:01:54,671
It's the sum of all these parts.

49
00:01:54,986 --> 00:01:56,346
Of that, the eyes alone

50
00:01:56,346 --> 00:01:58,506
send ten million bits per second.

51
00:01:58,507 --> 00:01:59,792
They are the primary source.

52
00:02:00,507 --> 00:02:00,891
However,

53
00:02:01,227 --> 00:02:02,186
your consciousness—

54
00:02:02,186 --> 00:02:04,371
the part you feel, reflect on,

55
00:02:04,626 --> 00:02:06,751
and can describe with language—

56
00:02:06,826 --> 00:02:08,586
can only process

57
00:02:08,586 --> 00:02:09,951
a maximum of fifty bits per second.

58
00:02:10,387 --> 00:02:12,831
A Caltech study from recent years

59
00:02:12,986 --> 00:02:15,752
even estimated this number to be as low as ten bits.

60
00:02:16,146 --> 00:02:17,512
Think about that ratio.

61
00:02:17,706 --> 00:02:19,671
From eleven million down to fifty—

62
00:02:19,787 --> 00:02:22,491
it means your brain performs a massive delete operation

63
00:02:22,546 --> 00:02:24,312
every single second.

64
00:02:24,507 --> 00:02:27,391
Over 99.999% of information is deleted.

65
00:02:27,826 --> 00:02:29,705
The remaining fraction of a percent

66
00:02:29,706 --> 00:02:32,352
is what you call "seeing the world."

67
00:02:32,826 --> 00:02:34,211
Where did the rest go?

68
00:02:34,706 --> 00:02:35,632
Nowhere.

69
00:02:35,787 --> 00:02:37,906
It was imaged by your eyes,

70
00:02:37,907 --> 00:02:39,586
it vibrated on your eardrums,

71
00:02:39,586 --> 00:02:41,472
it brushed against your skin,

72
00:02:41,507 --> 00:02:43,792
but your brain hit the delete key.

73
00:02:43,826 --> 00:02:45,632
It never entered your consciousness.

74
00:02:45,826 --> 00:02:48,825
You have never seen the world in its entirety,

75
00:02:48,826 --> 00:02:50,231
not even for a single second.

76
00:02:50,706 --> 00:02:51,972
At this point, you might think,

77
00:02:52,347 --> 00:02:53,412
"Isn't this a flaw?"

78
00:02:53,907 --> 00:02:55,532
"Isn't this just a lack of brain bandwidth?"

79
00:02:56,067 --> 00:02:56,611
Let me tell you,

80
00:02:56,947 --> 00:02:57,771
it's not a flaw.

81
00:02:58,106 --> 00:02:59,111
It's a design.

82
00:02:59,227 --> 00:03:02,032
It's the optimal solution filtered through millions of years of evolution.

83
00:03:02,467 --> 00:03:05,312
Imagine you're a primitive human tens of thousands of years ago,

84
00:03:05,387 --> 00:03:07,431
squatting by bushes picking wild fruit.

85
00:03:07,627 --> 00:03:10,096
Over a hundred pieces of information flood your field of vision simultaneously:

86
00:03:10,106 --> 00:03:13,852
distant clouds, nearby insects, the sound of wind rustling leaves,

87
00:03:14,026 --> 00:03:16,171
the humidity of the soil, your own breathing rhythm,

88
00:03:16,426 --> 00:03:19,831
the rumbling of your stomach, the path of an ant to your left.

89
00:03:20,266 --> 00:03:24,385
If your brain honestly presented all hundred-plus pieces of information to you

90
00:03:24,387 --> 00:03:26,425
and let you slowly decide which was most important,

91
00:03:26,426 --> 00:03:27,665
then within three seconds,

92
00:03:27,667 --> 00:03:30,991
the saber-toothed tiger hiding in the bushes to your right would have pounced on you.

93
00:03:31,227 --> 00:03:32,705
The ancestors who survived

94
00:03:32,706 --> 00:03:36,192
were those whose brains deleted information quickly and ruthlessly.

95
00:03:36,627 --> 00:03:37,545
After the deletion,

96
00:03:37,546 --> 00:03:40,312
only one or two critical signals remain in consciousness:

97
00:03:40,546 --> 00:03:43,792
the wind shifted, there's a low growl, that shadow looks wrong.

98
00:03:44,187 --> 00:03:46,105
This extremely blunt deletion ability

99
00:03:46,106 --> 00:03:48,872
was inherited intact by your brain today.

100
00:03:49,106 --> 00:03:50,186
It's not a defect;

101
00:03:50,187 --> 00:03:52,431
it's the fundamental reason you’re alive today.

102
00:03:52,947 --> 00:03:55,972
So how does the brain decide what to delete and what to keep?

103
00:03:56,467 --> 00:03:59,171
This brings us to the most important theoretical framework

104
00:03:59,187 --> 00:04:00,792
in neuroscience over the last twenty years,

105
00:04:00,826 --> 00:04:02,192
called Predictive Coding.

106
00:04:02,385 --> 00:04:03,186
Simply put,

107
00:04:03,187 --> 00:04:06,592
your brain isn't a video recorder passively receiving information;

108
00:04:06,747 --> 00:04:09,032
it's an active generator of predictions.

109
00:04:09,187 --> 00:04:12,425
Every moment, based on all your past experiences,

110
00:04:12,426 --> 00:04:16,906
it predicts what you should see, hear, or feel

111
00:04:16,906 --> 00:04:17,992
in the next second.

112
00:04:18,507 --> 00:04:21,391
When the actual sensory signals arrive,

113
00:04:21,427 --> 00:04:25,932
the brain only cares about one thing: Is there a difference between the signal and my prediction?

114
00:04:26,547 --> 00:04:27,831
The parts with no difference—

115
00:04:27,906 --> 00:04:31,151
which are the vast majority of correctly predicted signals—

116
00:04:31,226 --> 00:04:32,132
are suppressed immediately.

117
00:04:32,507 --> 00:04:33,752
They don't enter your consciousness.

118
00:04:33,987 --> 00:04:35,471
Only the differences—

119
00:04:35,507 --> 00:04:38,391
that handful of mispredicted 'surprises'—

120
00:04:38,427 --> 00:04:40,411
are upgraded into signals sent to you,

121
00:04:40,747 --> 00:04:41,752
allowing you to perceive them.

122
00:04:42,026 --> 00:04:42,651
For example,

123
00:04:42,987 --> 00:04:45,065
the brain is like a seasoned editor.

124
00:04:45,067 --> 00:04:48,432
It already has a draft for tomorrow's newspaper.

125
00:04:48,786 --> 00:04:49,826
Every morning,

126
00:04:49,826 --> 00:04:54,552
reporters send news from every corner of the city to the editorial office.

127
00:04:54,786 --> 00:04:56,391
The editor does only one thing:

128
00:04:56,466 --> 00:04:58,831
compares the live reports with the draft.

129
00:04:58,906 --> 00:05:01,271
Everything that matches goes straight into the shredder.

130
00:05:01,346 --> 00:05:04,192
Only the mismatches make it to tomorrow's front page.

131
00:05:04,706 --> 00:05:06,625
The newspaper you open in the morning

132
00:05:06,627 --> 00:05:09,312
is never a full account of what actually happened in the city;

133
00:05:09,387 --> 00:05:12,752
it's only the handful of surprises the editor found unexpected.

134
00:05:13,146 --> 00:05:15,497
There's a more precise description of this process in the brain:

135
00:05:15,507 --> 00:05:19,531
top-down predictions and bottom-up sensory signals

136
00:05:19,747 --> 00:05:21,672
meet in each layer of the cortex.

137
00:05:21,786 --> 00:05:22,812
Differences are passed up;

138
00:05:23,187 --> 00:05:24,591
predictions are pushed down.

139
00:05:25,266 --> 00:05:26,052
The smaller the difference,

140
00:05:26,346 --> 00:05:27,372
the quieter the consciousness.

141
00:05:27,987 --> 00:05:28,732
The larger the difference,

142
00:05:29,026 --> 00:05:30,072
the louder the consciousness.

143
00:05:30,706 --> 00:05:33,120
This is why you don't notice any details in the hallway

144
00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:35,271
of your home after walking through it ten thousand times,

145
00:05:35,307 --> 00:05:39,031
but if there's an extra pair of shoes in the entryway, you notice instantly.

146
00:05:39,146 --> 00:05:41,632
The parts that match the prediction are muted;

147
00:05:41,786 --> 00:05:44,471
the mismatching shoe jumps out at you.

148
00:05:44,666 --> 00:05:46,266
You think you're seeing the world,

149
00:05:46,266 --> 00:05:49,992
but you're actually seeing the error between your prediction and reality.

150
00:05:50,427 --> 00:05:51,252
The world itself

151
00:05:51,666 --> 00:05:53,791
has never been fully seen by you.

152
00:05:54,187 --> 00:05:57,132
This is essentially the continuous process of training and inference

153
00:05:57,266 --> 00:05:59,672
of our carbon-based AI model.

154
00:06:00,187 --> 00:06:01,752
Back to the gorilla experiment:

155
00:06:02,507 --> 00:06:04,651
Why did half the people not see the gorilla?

156
00:06:05,187 --> 00:06:08,112
Because the brain's task was to count passes by people in white shirts.

157
00:06:08,266 --> 00:06:12,312
It launched a prediction: there should be white shirts moving in this frame.

158
00:06:12,547 --> 00:06:16,752
A black, giant, slowly walking object wasn't in the prediction.

159
00:06:16,906 --> 00:06:19,012
Since it was irrelevant to the goal of counting balls,

160
00:06:19,346 --> 00:06:19,992
it was deleted.

161
00:06:20,507 --> 00:06:21,786
It was deleted so thoroughly

162
00:06:21,786 --> 00:06:24,391
that it never even entered conscious awareness.

163
00:06:24,507 --> 00:06:26,992
It's like a file thrown into the recycle bin,

164
00:06:27,067 --> 00:06:29,752
without staying on your desktop for even a second.

165
00:06:30,266 --> 00:06:32,225
The truly frightening thing about this

166
00:06:32,226 --> 00:06:33,386
isn't found in a laboratory,

167
00:06:33,387 --> 00:06:34,432
but out on the streets.

168
00:06:34,666 --> 00:06:36,105
In the 1990s,

169
00:06:36,107 --> 00:06:39,632
there was a famous case in the Boston Police Department.

170
00:06:39,666 --> 00:06:42,232
A young officer was chasing a suspect at night.

171
00:06:42,307 --> 00:06:43,665
During the pursuit,

172
00:06:43,666 --> 00:06:46,112
he ran past a group of people fighting.

173
00:06:46,187 --> 00:06:47,471
Later, video footage proved

174
00:06:47,586 --> 00:06:50,192
that the group was beating a fallen fellow officer.

175
00:06:50,427 --> 00:06:53,151
But the pursuing officer insisted he saw nothing.

176
00:06:53,466 --> 00:06:54,692
He was charged with perjury

177
00:06:55,026 --> 00:06:56,312
and nearly fired.

178
00:06:56,627 --> 00:06:58,711
Later, psychologists did a full reconstruction

179
00:06:58,786 --> 00:07:02,872
proving his brain's prediction was focused on catching the suspect.

180
00:07:03,067 --> 00:07:05,591
All signals outside of that mission path,

181
00:07:05,627 --> 00:07:08,391
even a violent scene less than three meters away,

182
00:07:08,466 --> 00:07:10,951
were completely cleared by his predictive system.

183
00:07:11,387 --> 00:07:13,386
Legally, he was later acquitted

184
00:07:13,387 --> 00:07:16,312
because science proved he truly didn't see it.

185
00:07:16,826 --> 00:07:18,872
But think about what this means.

186
00:07:18,947 --> 00:07:20,185
Whether or not you see something

187
00:07:20,187 --> 00:07:23,432
doesn't depend on whether it happened in front of you,

188
00:07:23,627 --> 00:07:26,665
but on whether your brain's predictive script at that moment

189
00:07:26,666 --> 00:07:28,312
left a space for it.

190
00:07:28,826 --> 00:07:32,305
There is a term in cognitive psychology for this phenomenon:

191
00:07:32,307 --> 00:07:33,951
Inattentional Blindness.

192
00:07:34,346 --> 00:07:37,031
There is also a sister phenomenon called Change Blindness.

193
00:07:37,187 --> 00:07:40,331
Around 2000, Canadian psychologist Ronald Rensink

194
00:07:40,507 --> 00:07:41,889
conducted a very famous experiment.

195
00:07:41,899 --> 00:07:44,232
He showed an image to participants,

196
00:07:44,346 --> 00:07:46,012
flashed a black screen in the middle,

197
00:07:46,266 --> 00:07:47,232
and then switched back.

198
00:07:47,387 --> 00:07:48,706
Between the two images,

199
00:07:48,706 --> 00:07:50,625
he would secretly change a core object—

200
00:07:50,627 --> 00:07:54,826
a cup on the table, a painting, or the color of someone's clothes—

201
00:07:54,826 --> 00:07:56,432
to something completely different.

202
00:07:56,786 --> 00:08:00,471
Most people took dozens of seconds to notice the change.

203
00:08:00,507 --> 00:08:02,632
Some didn't notice it at all.

204
00:08:02,867 --> 00:08:05,872
The most absurd variant of this experiment is the real-life version.

205
00:08:06,146 --> 00:08:09,312
A researcher stops a stranger on the street to ask for directions.

206
00:08:09,547 --> 00:08:10,711
Mid-conversation,

207
00:08:10,747 --> 00:08:14,512
several workers walk between them carrying a large door,

208
00:08:14,547 --> 00:08:15,791
briefly blocking their view.

209
00:08:16,107 --> 00:08:17,312
In that split second,

210
00:08:17,346 --> 00:08:20,192
the person asking for directions is swapped for someone else.

211
00:08:20,307 --> 00:08:24,552
Different height, clothes, hair, voice, and even gender.

212
00:08:24,786 --> 00:08:25,531
The door moves away,

213
00:08:25,747 --> 00:08:26,791
and the conversation continues.

214
00:08:27,226 --> 00:08:28,346
The study recorded that

215
00:08:28,346 --> 00:08:30,920
over half of the participants didn't realize

216
00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:32,432
they were now talking to a different person.

217
00:08:32,826 --> 00:08:35,631
They just kept giving directions to the stranger.

218
00:08:36,067 --> 00:08:38,792
Your vision is not a high-definition camera;

219
00:08:38,907 --> 00:08:40,432
it's more like a painter.

220
00:08:40,547 --> 00:08:44,111
It only paints carefully at the exact point you are staring at;

221
00:08:44,226 --> 00:08:46,792
everything else is filled in by memory and prediction.

222
00:08:47,187 --> 00:08:51,672
The clear area in the center of your vision is only about two degrees—

223
00:08:51,746 --> 00:08:55,312
roughly the size of your thumbnail at arm's length.

224
00:08:55,586 --> 00:08:57,111
Everything else is blurry.

225
00:08:57,466 --> 00:09:00,265
The reason the whole world feels clear

226
00:09:00,267 --> 00:09:03,392
is simply because your eyes jump several times per second,

227
00:09:03,466 --> 00:09:08,312
giving the brain enough material to composite a clear-looking image.

228
00:09:08,626 --> 00:09:09,511
At this point,

229
00:09:09,547 --> 00:09:12,432
everyone listening should feel a bit uneasy.

230
00:09:12,826 --> 00:09:16,912
This reality is far more serious than just 'making a mistake.'

231
00:09:17,307 --> 00:09:17,971
It means that

232
00:09:18,267 --> 00:09:19,865
the objective world you perceive

233
00:09:19,866 --> 00:09:25,025
is a personalized, second-hand report customized by your brain

234
00:09:25,027 --> 00:09:28,032
based on past experiences, biases, habits, and emotions.

235
00:09:28,586 --> 00:09:30,672
Everyone's report is different.

236
00:09:30,986 --> 00:09:32,785
Two people standing in the same room

237
00:09:32,787 --> 00:09:35,072
are not seeing the same world at all.

238
00:09:35,667 --> 00:09:36,831
So here's the question:

239
00:09:37,187 --> 00:09:38,711
How does this filtering mechanism

240
00:09:38,746 --> 00:09:41,932
decide what to delete and what to keep?

241
00:09:42,586 --> 00:09:43,131
The answer is:

242
00:09:43,626 --> 00:09:45,871
The sum of all your past experiences.

243
00:09:46,586 --> 00:09:48,511
From the very first day you were born,

244
00:09:48,626 --> 00:09:50,131
every time you learned this is edible,

245
00:09:50,466 --> 00:09:51,392
that causes pain,

246
00:09:51,626 --> 00:09:53,951
or this expression means Mom is angry,

247
00:09:54,106 --> 00:09:57,912
you were quietly rewriting your brain's thick dictionary of predictions.

248
00:09:58,226 --> 00:10:01,105
In terms of your carbon-based AI model,

249
00:10:01,106 --> 00:10:04,312
these are the parameters of a neural network being constantly retrained.

250
00:10:05,106 --> 00:10:08,211
Where you grew up, the language you speak, the books you read,

251
00:10:08,547 --> 00:10:12,312
who you deal with, the money you've lost, the things that made you proud—

252
00:10:12,626 --> 00:10:13,792
all of this

253
00:10:13,947 --> 00:10:16,912
eventually condenses into a set of deletion rules

254
00:10:17,027 --> 00:10:18,392
etched into your brain.

255
00:10:18,826 --> 00:10:21,666
This set of rules has a particularly terrifying characteristic:

256
00:10:21,667 --> 00:10:23,152
it is self-reinforcing.

257
00:10:23,787 --> 00:10:27,011
Your deletion rules lean toward letting you see only

258
00:10:27,226 --> 00:10:29,351
signals that confirm your existing beliefs,

259
00:10:29,386 --> 00:10:31,471
while quietly deleting contradictory signals.

260
00:10:31,706 --> 00:10:33,672
Psychology calls this confirmation bias.

261
00:10:34,027 --> 00:10:36,591
But it's not actually a psychological preference;

262
00:10:36,667 --> 00:10:39,240
it's a deletion command automatically executed

263
00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:41,711
by predictive coding without your knowledge.

264
00:10:42,267 --> 00:10:45,032
You think you are observing the world objectively,

265
00:10:45,187 --> 00:10:48,251
but you are actually constantly collecting evidence

266
00:10:48,307 --> 00:10:50,751
to prove that what you already believe is right.

267
00:10:51,147 --> 00:10:52,066
After ten years of this,

268
00:10:52,067 --> 00:10:54,711
you become more convinced than ever that what you see is the truth.

269
00:10:55,267 --> 00:10:56,471
So, could this mechanism

270
00:10:56,547 --> 00:10:59,451
be ruining the most important decisions of your life?

271
00:11:00,106 --> 00:11:01,951
I've been in early-stage investing for over twenty years,

272
00:11:02,067 --> 00:11:04,711
and I can tell you a heart-wrenching observation:

273
00:11:04,986 --> 00:11:08,032
People who make big money in investing over the long term

274
00:11:08,106 --> 00:11:09,951
don't do it because they are smarter

275
00:11:09,986 --> 00:11:12,111
or better informed.

276
00:11:12,267 --> 00:11:14,871
It's because their brain's deletion rules

277
00:11:14,907 --> 00:11:16,792
are different from those of the vast majority.

278
00:11:17,267 --> 00:11:19,912
There is a Warren Buffett quote that's been cited ten thousand times:

279
00:11:20,147 --> 00:11:21,905
"Be fearful when others are greedy,

280
00:11:21,907 --> 00:11:23,631
and greedy when others are fearful."

281
00:11:23,947 --> 00:11:25,371
This sounds like pure cliché,

282
00:11:25,706 --> 00:11:26,052
doesn't it?

283
00:11:26,667 --> 00:11:27,772
Everyone knows the logic.

284
00:11:28,226 --> 00:11:31,572
But at the peak of the 2000 dot-com bubble,

285
00:11:32,027 --> 00:11:33,932
on the eve of the 2007 subprime crisis,

286
00:11:34,307 --> 00:11:37,751
or during the months of crypto madness in 2021,

287
00:11:37,947 --> 00:11:40,706
90% of the market was greedy.

288
00:11:40,706 --> 00:11:41,831
They couldn't be fearful.

289
00:11:42,106 --> 00:11:42,892
Why?

290
00:11:43,346 --> 00:11:47,711
Because their brains had already deleted all the danger signals for them.

291
00:11:48,067 --> 00:11:49,511
Think about this mechanism.

292
00:11:49,986 --> 00:11:52,111
When everyone is making money,

293
00:11:52,187 --> 00:11:53,351
you open your phone

294
00:11:53,466 --> 00:11:55,792
and see screenshots of other people's gains.

295
00:11:55,947 --> 00:11:58,552
You hear friends talk about stocks doubling;

296
00:11:58,746 --> 00:12:01,711
you scroll through arguments for why "this time is different."

297
00:12:01,866 --> 00:12:04,826
These signals repeat and are predicted correctly over and over,

298
00:12:04,826 --> 00:12:07,131
so the brain judges: This is the norm.

299
00:12:07,386 --> 00:12:08,432
No need to pay attention.

300
00:12:08,826 --> 00:12:12,371
Meanwhile, record-high P/E ratios, off-the-charts leverage,

301
00:12:12,626 --> 00:12:15,666
and contrary signals that a business model isn't profitable—

302
00:12:15,667 --> 00:12:18,991
because they appear rarely and don't match your experience of profit—

303
00:12:19,067 --> 00:12:22,072
are deleted by the prediction system as noise.

304
00:12:22,626 --> 00:12:23,652
On the day of the crash,

305
00:12:24,027 --> 00:12:26,572
most people say the same thing: "Why was it so sudden?"

306
00:12:27,187 --> 00:12:27,851
It wasn't sudden.

307
00:12:28,226 --> 00:12:29,991
Those signals were always there;

308
00:12:30,067 --> 00:12:31,951
your brain just deleted them for you.

309
00:12:32,547 --> 00:12:34,552
I personally witnessed a friend's story.

310
00:12:34,866 --> 00:12:36,072
In late 2017,

311
00:12:36,106 --> 00:12:39,152
before Bitcoin hit its then-record high of nearly $20,000,

312
00:12:39,187 --> 00:12:40,552
he took a heavy position.

313
00:12:40,746 --> 00:12:43,392
I talked to him almost once a week during that time.

314
00:12:43,506 --> 00:12:45,951
Every time, he showed me articles he'd saved:

315
00:12:46,067 --> 00:12:47,851
An analyst saying it would reach $100,000,

316
00:12:48,226 --> 00:12:51,792
a miner's cost calculation, news of another fund adding to its position.

317
00:12:51,907 --> 00:12:52,371
I asked him,

318
00:12:52,706 --> 00:12:54,292
"Do you read the bearish reports?"

319
00:12:54,947 --> 00:12:55,292
He said,

320
00:12:55,667 --> 00:12:55,851
"I do."

321
00:12:56,226 --> 00:12:57,292
"But they're worthless;

322
00:12:57,506 --> 00:12:58,192
I ignore them."

323
00:12:58,547 --> 00:13:01,591
Later, he gave back almost all his gains in that cycle.

324
00:13:02,027 --> 00:13:03,672
When he reflected on it later,

325
00:13:03,706 --> 00:13:05,471
he said something I'll always remember:

326
00:13:05,667 --> 00:13:08,192
"It wasn't that I didn't read the bearish reports,

327
00:13:08,226 --> 00:13:10,231
it's that after reading them, they didn't sink in."

328
00:13:10,346 --> 00:13:11,331
His eyes saw them,

329
00:13:11,506 --> 00:13:12,511
but his brain didn't register them.

330
00:13:12,706 --> 00:13:13,792
It's not that he was stupid;

331
00:13:13,866 --> 00:13:16,672
it's that his prediction system was filtering out signals for him.

332
00:13:16,866 --> 00:13:20,672
His brain was already occupied by the prediction that it would rise.

333
00:13:20,787 --> 00:13:24,392
All opposing signals were crushed into noise and discarded.

334
00:13:24,787 --> 00:13:27,346
Buffett can be fearful when others are greedy,

335
00:13:27,346 --> 00:13:29,066
not because he is braver than you,

336
00:13:29,067 --> 00:13:33,432
but because he trained a different set of deletion rules over decades.

337
00:13:33,866 --> 00:13:36,491
His brain weights P/E ratios, safety margins,

338
00:13:36,787 --> 00:13:40,511
and discounted cash flows very heavily,

339
00:13:40,626 --> 00:13:44,711
while weighting market sentiment and short-term volatility very low.

340
00:13:45,027 --> 00:13:49,192
When the same market data flows through his optic nerve and yours,

341
00:13:49,226 --> 00:13:51,186
what he sees and what you see

342
00:13:51,187 --> 00:13:52,871
are simply not the same thing.

343
00:13:53,547 --> 00:13:56,192
He didn't see opportunities that others missed;

344
00:13:56,307 --> 00:13:59,312
he just didn't delete the signals that others did.

345
00:13:59,947 --> 00:14:01,331
So the essence of attention

346
00:14:01,667 --> 00:14:03,192
is never about focusing.

347
00:14:03,706 --> 00:14:05,991
The essence of attention is deletion.

348
00:14:06,386 --> 00:14:08,225
Where you direct your attention

349
00:14:08,226 --> 00:14:09,946
is effectively telling your brain:

350
00:14:09,947 --> 00:14:11,572
"Don't delete signals from this channel;

351
00:14:11,947 --> 00:14:12,792
keep them."

352
00:14:13,147 --> 00:14:13,692
As for everything else,

353
00:14:13,986 --> 00:14:14,912
"do as you see fit."

354
00:14:15,267 --> 00:14:16,265
Over time,

355
00:14:16,267 --> 00:14:19,111
you become someone who can only see certain types of info.

356
00:14:19,267 --> 00:14:21,272
And the information you can't see

357
00:14:21,346 --> 00:14:24,032
determines what walls you'll hit in life.

358
00:14:24,386 --> 00:14:28,652
Essentially, the parameters of their carbon-based AI models are different.

359
00:14:29,187 --> 00:14:29,731
In plain terms,

360
00:14:30,027 --> 00:14:32,152
their cognitive models are different.

361
00:14:32,547 --> 00:14:35,011
This happens quietly in investing, in relationships,

362
00:14:35,386 --> 00:14:38,586
in social interactions, and in every judgment you make.

363
00:14:38,586 --> 00:14:40,032
It's happening all the time.

364
00:14:40,346 --> 00:14:43,025
A person who only sees their partner's flaws for years

365
00:14:43,027 --> 00:14:45,192
isn't because the partner truly has no virtues;

366
00:14:45,346 --> 00:14:48,000
it's because the switch in their brain that labels virtues

367
00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,991
as irrelevant signals has been on for too long.

368
00:14:51,346 --> 00:14:53,826
A person who feels the world is unfair to them

369
00:14:53,826 --> 00:14:56,032
isn't because the world is actually out to get them;

370
00:14:56,147 --> 00:14:59,145
it's because their prediction system filters kindness into the background

371
00:14:59,147 --> 00:15:01,192
and magnifies hostility into headlines.

372
00:15:01,626 --> 00:15:03,672
You think you're making objective judgments,

373
00:15:03,706 --> 00:15:07,912
but you're actually executing a deletion list written years ago.

374
00:15:08,346 --> 00:15:08,652
So,

375
00:15:08,986 --> 00:15:10,432
here comes the critical question:

376
00:15:10,626 --> 00:15:13,011
If the reality everyone holds is a version customized

377
00:15:13,027 --> 00:15:15,312
by their own prediction system,

378
00:15:15,427 --> 00:15:17,331
does objective truth even exist?

379
00:15:17,746 --> 00:15:19,152
Let me be clear:

380
00:15:19,226 --> 00:15:21,152
I'm not saying reality doesn't exist.

381
00:15:21,547 --> 00:15:22,812
The physical world exists.

382
00:15:23,067 --> 00:15:24,312
Tables are hard,

383
00:15:24,386 --> 00:15:25,451
hot water burns,

384
00:15:25,746 --> 00:15:27,912
and a red light is a red light.

385
00:15:28,149 --> 00:15:28,948
However,

386
00:15:29,027 --> 00:15:33,426
pure, raw reality untouched by a cognitive system

387
00:15:33,427 --> 00:15:35,471
is something you will never experience.

388
00:15:36,187 --> 00:15:37,552
What you experience

389
00:15:37,586 --> 00:15:41,471
is always just the compressed file your brain processed for you.

390
00:15:41,986 --> 00:15:42,912
This fact

391
00:15:42,986 --> 00:15:45,631
was discovered by some people 2,500 years ago.

392
00:15:46,027 --> 00:15:46,892
The line from Buddhist scriptures,

393
00:15:47,147 --> 00:15:48,346
"All that takes form

394
00:15:48,346 --> 00:15:49,172
is move and illusion."

395
00:15:49,547 --> 00:15:51,111
I used to think it was poetry;

396
00:15:51,226 --> 00:15:54,471
now I think it's more like a neuroscience report.

397
00:15:54,626 --> 00:15:56,066
Everything you see

398
00:15:56,067 --> 00:15:57,772
is a product of your brain's predictions,

399
00:15:57,986 --> 00:15:59,351
not the thing itself.

400
00:15:59,986 --> 00:16:00,412
Zhuangzi said,

401
00:16:00,787 --> 00:16:02,745
"You cannot speak of the ocean to a frog in a well,"

402
00:16:02,746 --> 00:16:03,912
"for it is limited by its space."

403
00:16:04,027 --> 00:16:06,186
The frog in the well doesn't fail to see because of poor eyesight;

404
00:16:06,187 --> 00:16:09,631
it's because the 'ocean' channel doesn't exist in its prediction system.

405
00:16:10,226 --> 00:16:11,985
The deepest path of spiritual practice—

406
00:16:11,986 --> 00:16:16,231
whether Zen, meditation, or rigorous scientific training—

407
00:16:16,346 --> 00:16:18,231
is likely doing the same thing.

408
00:16:18,506 --> 00:16:21,991
It attempts to pause the brain's automatic deletion rules,

409
00:16:22,067 --> 00:16:24,385
allowing information that was previously suppressed

410
00:16:24,386 --> 00:16:25,792
to surface for the first time.

411
00:16:26,106 --> 00:16:27,865
This isn't about making you see more,

412
00:16:27,866 --> 00:16:29,625
but making you realize for the first time

413
00:16:29,626 --> 00:16:31,371
exactly what it is

414
00:16:31,586 --> 00:16:32,711
that you have been missing all along.

415
00:16:33,307 --> 00:16:35,672
During meditation, you might notice your breath—

416
00:16:35,826 --> 00:16:37,711
the breath that has been with you your entire life,

417
00:16:37,826 --> 00:16:40,211
yet you hadn't truly felt it for a single second.

418
00:16:40,787 --> 00:16:44,711
While writing, you might notice the subtle vibration of the pen on paper,

419
00:16:44,866 --> 00:16:47,231
something you never truly touched before.

420
00:16:47,547 --> 00:16:49,625
These things aren't new;

421
00:16:49,626 --> 00:16:51,346
they have always been there.

422
00:16:51,346 --> 00:16:55,751
They were just suppressed as background noise by your deletion rules.

423
00:16:56,506 --> 00:16:57,532
To use another analogy,

424
00:16:57,866 --> 00:16:58,985
the process of practice

425
00:16:58,986 --> 00:17:03,631
is like closing high-CPU background programs in the brain,

426
00:17:03,706 --> 00:17:04,571
such as greed, anger, and ignorance,

427
00:17:04,906 --> 00:17:06,231
or the ego and self-attachment.

428
00:17:06,346 --> 00:17:08,852
This frees up computing power for real information

429
00:17:08,906 --> 00:17:10,711
to enter your conscious processing,

430
00:17:10,826 --> 00:17:14,592
rendering a world that is richer and closer to reality.

431
00:17:14,625 --> 00:17:15,346
Of course,

432
00:17:15,346 --> 00:17:18,066
turning off all deletion rules is impossible,

433
00:17:18,067 --> 00:17:18,991
nor should you.

434
00:17:19,346 --> 00:17:21,711
Without deletion, you would collapse in three seconds,

435
00:17:21,747 --> 00:17:25,071
as consciousness cannot handle a flood of 11 million bits.

436
00:17:25,467 --> 00:17:27,465
The goal of practice is not to turn it off,

437
00:17:27,467 --> 00:17:29,031
but to make it visible to you.

438
00:17:29,067 --> 00:17:31,271
To see your deletion rules at work,

439
00:17:31,346 --> 00:17:33,346
to see what they are deleting for you,

440
00:17:33,346 --> 00:17:36,271
and to see if what's being deleted truly should be.

441
00:17:36,507 --> 00:17:37,832
I have no final conclusion for you.

442
00:17:37,987 --> 00:17:40,872
In this episode, I just want to present you with a fact:

443
00:17:40,987 --> 00:17:44,071
Your brain performs a censorship every single second.

444
00:17:44,267 --> 00:17:46,872
It deletes 99.999% of input,

445
00:17:46,906 --> 00:17:49,905
and hands you the remaining fraction of a percent,

446
00:17:49,906 --> 00:17:51,632
telling you, "This is the world."

447
00:17:52,547 --> 00:17:55,912
This censorship began the moment you were born

448
00:17:55,946 --> 00:17:57,705
and continues to this day,

449
00:17:57,707 --> 00:17:58,951
never stopping for a moment.

450
00:17:59,186 --> 00:18:00,945
What's interesting is that today,

451
00:18:00,946 --> 00:18:01,892
as you listen to this,

452
00:18:02,106 --> 00:18:03,832
that censorship is still at work.

453
00:18:03,866 --> 00:18:06,852
It is deciding for you which parts of this talk are worth remembering

454
00:18:07,067 --> 00:18:08,311
and which can be discarded.

455
00:18:08,386 --> 00:18:09,905
By the time you turn off this video,

456
00:18:09,906 --> 00:18:11,432
it will have already finished the job.

457
00:18:11,707 --> 00:18:13,071
Finally, I want to ask you:

458
00:18:13,106 --> 00:18:17,071
When was the last time you noticed something

459
00:18:17,227 --> 00:18:17,892
that you had been overlooking for a long time?

460
00:18:18,626 --> 00:18:21,119
Maybe you suddenly realized a family member's

461
00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:23,392
expression has been different for a long time.

462
00:18:23,507 --> 00:18:26,539
Maybe in a review, you found that signs of an investment loss

463
00:18:26,539 --> 00:18:29,112
had actually been there all along.

464
00:18:29,186 --> 00:18:31,531
Or maybe while reading, you suddenly

465
00:18:31,586 --> 00:18:34,711
heard that voice in your head that is always talking.

466
00:18:35,386 --> 00:18:37,546
Share that moment in the comments,

467
00:18:37,547 --> 00:18:39,026
and let's compare

468
00:18:39,027 --> 00:18:42,152
to see just how different everyone's deletion rules are.

469
00:18:42,586 --> 00:18:45,751
The most interesting thing was never what we saw,

470
00:18:45,787 --> 00:18:49,392
but what exactly it is that we have missed our entire lives.

471
00:18:49,626 --> 00:18:50,251
I am Wang Lijie.

472
00:18:50,586 --> 00:18:51,692
See you next time.
