﻿1
00:00:00,383 --> 00:00:01,375
Sarvastivada

2
00:00:01,782 --> 00:00:03,435
The Physicists of Buddhism

3
00:00:03,782 --> 00:00:07,275
In the last episode, we mapped out the landscape of Sectarian Buddhism:

4
00:00:07,623 --> 00:00:08,455
Eighteen schools,

5
00:00:08,823 --> 00:00:10,156
Four core disputes.

6
00:00:10,303 --> 00:00:11,916
But I left you with one final question:

7
00:00:12,262 --> 00:00:15,656
What kind of philosophical edifice did Sarvastivada build?

8
00:00:16,182 --> 00:00:16,536
Today,

9
00:00:16,862 --> 00:00:18,475
we step inside that edifice.

10
00:00:18,943 --> 00:00:20,675
Once inside, you'll find

11
00:00:20,823 --> 00:00:23,036
it doesn't resemble a Buddhist temple;

12
00:00:23,422 --> 00:00:25,435
it looks more like a laboratory.

13
00:00:25,783 --> 00:00:26,096
Hello,

14
00:00:26,503 --> 00:00:26,975
everyone.

15
00:00:27,382 --> 00:00:28,435
I'm Wang Lijie.

16
00:00:28,902 --> 00:00:29,775
Sarvastivada,

17
00:00:30,222 --> 00:00:31,995
known in Sanskrit as Sarvāstivāda,

18
00:00:32,182 --> 00:00:34,756
is the most significant branch of Sthavira Buddhism.

19
00:00:35,182 --> 00:00:38,915
It broke away from the Sthavira school around the 3rd century BCE.

20
00:00:39,023 --> 00:00:43,415
Its center of activity spanned Gandhara (modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan)

21
00:00:43,662 --> 00:00:44,835
and Kashmir.

22
00:00:45,302 --> 00:00:47,262
For several centuries,

23
00:00:47,262 --> 00:00:50,555
it was the most influential Buddhist school in Northern India.

24
00:00:50,902 --> 00:00:52,375
Why do I say they are like physicists?

25
00:00:52,942 --> 00:00:56,316
Because they did something unprecedented in Buddhist history:

26
00:00:56,703 --> 00:00:59,875
they attempted to compile a complete parts list of the universe.

27
00:01:00,503 --> 00:01:01,835
The Buddha taught Dependent Origination—

28
00:01:02,103 --> 00:01:04,756
all phenomena arise from the convergence of causes and conditions;

29
00:01:04,903 --> 00:01:06,635
nothing has an independent, unchanging nature.

30
00:01:07,143 --> 00:01:08,915
This doctrine sounds simple enough,

31
00:01:08,942 --> 00:01:11,275
but have you considered a more specific question?

32
00:01:11,543 --> 00:01:12,415
"Convergence of conditions:"

33
00:01:12,742 --> 00:01:15,055
Exactly what is converging with what?

34
00:01:15,543 --> 00:01:17,915
You say a flower is a product of conditions.

35
00:01:18,102 --> 00:01:18,296
Fine.

36
00:01:18,582 --> 00:01:20,415
But what are the specific elements of that convergence?

37
00:01:20,862 --> 00:01:24,676
Seeds, soil, water, sunlight, air?

38
00:01:24,942 --> 00:01:27,501
But the seed itself is a product of conditions.

39
00:01:27,503 --> 00:01:29,575
Then what are the elements of the seed?

40
00:01:30,343 --> 00:01:31,902
Once this inquiry begins,

41
00:01:31,903 --> 00:01:33,676
it must go to the very bottom.

42
00:01:33,942 --> 00:01:37,516
Just as physicists seek the smallest units of matter,

43
00:01:37,742 --> 00:01:39,676
Sarvastivada sought

44
00:01:39,703 --> 00:01:43,316
the ultimate units that constitute our empirical world.

45
00:01:43,503 --> 00:01:46,075
Their answer was the Seventy-five Dharmas.

46
00:01:46,543 --> 00:01:49,275
In Buddhism, "Dharma" is a catch-all term

47
00:01:49,343 --> 00:01:50,555
with numerous meanings.

48
00:01:50,783 --> 00:01:52,956
But in the context of Sarvastivada,

49
00:01:53,022 --> 00:01:56,956
a "Dharma" is a fundamental element of all empirical phenomena.

50
00:01:57,183 --> 00:02:00,236
You can compare them to elementary particles in physics.

51
00:02:00,582 --> 00:02:04,355
Physics says matter consists of quarks and leptons;

52
00:02:04,582 --> 00:02:08,515
Sarvastivada says experience consists of 75 Dharmas.

53
00:02:08,943 --> 00:02:11,436
These 75 Dharmas are divided into five categories.

54
00:02:11,782 --> 00:02:13,056
The first is Rupa (Form),

55
00:02:13,342 --> 00:02:14,355
consisting of eleven types.

56
00:02:14,663 --> 00:02:17,235
In Buddhism, "Rupa" doesn't just mean color;

57
00:02:17,383 --> 00:02:18,795
it refers to material things.

58
00:02:19,022 --> 00:02:22,195
Anything that has resistance and occupies space counts,

59
00:02:22,502 --> 00:02:25,836
including the five sense organs: eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body,

60
00:02:26,022 --> 00:02:28,395
plus their five corresponding external objects:

61
00:02:28,423 --> 00:02:30,596
sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches.

62
00:02:30,782 --> 00:02:33,395
Plus something called Avijnapti-rupa (Unmanifest Form).

63
00:02:33,902 --> 00:02:35,056
What is Unmanifest Form?

64
00:02:35,663 --> 00:02:37,901
It is a material force that you cannot see or touch,

65
00:02:37,902 --> 00:02:40,515
yet it truly exists.

66
00:02:40,943 --> 00:02:42,156
For example, if you take Buddhist precepts,

67
00:02:42,342 --> 00:02:44,195
after the ceremony concludes,

68
00:02:44,223 --> 00:02:46,876
a "precept-body" (jie-ti) forms within you.

69
00:02:47,502 --> 00:02:49,756
It isn't a material form you can observe,

70
00:02:49,902 --> 00:02:52,635
but it actively influences your behavior and psyche.

71
00:02:53,022 --> 00:02:55,996
Sarvastivada classifies this as a type of Rupa.

72
00:02:56,302 --> 00:02:57,336
The second category is Citta (Mind).

73
00:02:57,742 --> 00:02:58,635
There is only one:

74
00:02:58,663 --> 00:02:59,175
Mind,

75
00:02:59,663 --> 00:03:00,795
also called the King of Mind.

76
00:03:01,263 --> 00:03:03,355
This is the commander-in-chief of all conscious activity.

77
00:03:03,742 --> 00:03:04,096
Note that

78
00:03:04,462 --> 00:03:07,395
Sarvastivada posits only one Mind King,

79
00:03:07,502 --> 00:03:10,316
unlike the later Yogacara school which identified eight consciousnesses.

80
00:03:10,582 --> 00:03:11,695
In their system,

81
00:03:11,902 --> 00:03:13,316
Mind is a single entity,

82
00:03:13,383 --> 00:03:16,635
presenting different functions in different contexts.

83
00:03:16,983 --> 00:03:18,695
The third category is Mental Concomitants (Caitasika dharmas).

84
00:03:18,943 --> 00:03:20,116
There are forty-six types,

85
00:03:20,383 --> 00:03:22,955
making it the largest group among the Seventy-five Dharmas.

86
00:03:23,663 --> 00:03:27,075
These are mental functions that accompany the King of Mind.

87
00:03:27,663 --> 00:03:30,276
Think of the Mind King as a phone's processor;

88
00:03:30,582 --> 00:03:33,795
caitasikas are the apps running on that processor.

89
00:03:34,223 --> 00:03:36,515
There are both good apps and bad apps.

90
00:03:36,862 --> 00:03:39,316
These forty-six types are divided into six groups.

91
00:03:39,782 --> 00:03:40,975
The first group is Universal (Mahābhūmika) dharmas.

92
00:03:41,223 --> 00:03:42,156
There are ten of them,

93
00:03:42,302 --> 00:03:49,156
including contact, attention, feeling, perception, volition, desire, wisdom, mindfulness, concentration, and resolve.

94
00:03:49,462 --> 00:03:50,536
Why are they called Universal?

95
00:03:51,022 --> 00:03:53,936
Because these ten mental functions are present in every single

96
00:03:54,143 --> 00:03:55,716
conscious activity.

97
00:03:55,823 --> 00:03:56,695
Like a band,

98
00:03:57,022 --> 00:03:58,581
no matter what song is played,

99
00:03:58,582 --> 00:04:00,795
these ten musicians are always on stage.

100
00:04:01,103 --> 00:04:02,735
The second group is Virtuous (Kuśalamahābhūmika) dharmas.

101
00:04:03,062 --> 00:04:03,955
There are ten types,

102
00:04:04,143 --> 00:04:08,536
including faith, diligence, pliancy, equanimity, shame,

103
00:04:09,143 --> 00:04:13,235
remorse, non-attachment, non-hatred, non-harm, and vigor.

104
00:04:13,663 --> 00:04:16,036
Whenever your mind is doing a good deed,

105
00:04:16,262 --> 00:04:18,555
these ten are necessarily present.

106
00:04:19,182 --> 00:04:21,175
The third group is Defiled (Kleśamahābhūmika) dharmas.

107
00:04:21,463 --> 00:04:22,396
There are six types:

108
00:04:22,702 --> 00:04:27,355
ignorance, negligence, indolence, lack of faith, torpor, and restlessness.

109
00:04:27,663 --> 00:04:28,896
Whenever there is affliction in your mind,

110
00:04:29,182 --> 00:04:30,915
these six will follow.

111
00:04:31,423 --> 00:04:33,415
The fourth group is Evil (Akuśalamahābhūmika) dharmas.

112
00:04:33,663 --> 00:04:34,516
There are two types:

113
00:04:34,742 --> 00:04:36,235
shame-lessness and lack of remorse.

114
00:04:36,622 --> 00:04:38,302
Whenever you do something unwholesome,

115
00:04:38,302 --> 00:04:39,995
these two are always present.

116
00:04:40,502 --> 00:04:42,435
The former means not feeling ashamed;

117
00:04:42,543 --> 00:04:45,036
the latter means not caring about hurting others.

118
00:04:45,382 --> 00:04:47,055
The fifth group is Minor Affliction (Upakleśabhūmika) dharmas.

119
00:04:47,302 --> 00:04:48,196
There are ten types,

120
00:04:48,423 --> 00:04:54,755
including anger, hostility, concealment, affliction, envy, stinginess, deceit, flattery, pride, and harm.

121
00:04:54,983 --> 00:04:57,355
These are the trivial afflictions that pop up occasionally.

122
00:04:57,622 --> 00:04:58,975
The sixth group is Indeterminate (Aniyatabhūmika) dharmas.

123
00:04:59,343 --> 00:05:00,196
There are eight types,

124
00:05:00,262 --> 00:05:05,675
including regret, sleep, reasoning, investigation, greed, hatred, conceit, and doubt.

125
00:05:05,903 --> 00:05:08,276
These functions sometimes align with good

126
00:05:08,302 --> 00:05:09,622
and sometimes align with evil;

127
00:05:09,622 --> 00:05:10,408
they are not fixed.

128
00:05:10,583 --> 00:05:14,115
Let me use an example to show how precise this system is.

129
00:05:14,423 --> 00:05:16,196
As you listen to me speak,

130
00:05:16,742 --> 00:05:16,935
Contact:

131
00:05:17,502 --> 00:05:19,915
Your ears receive the sound wave signals.

132
00:05:20,382 --> 00:05:20,815
Attention:

133
00:05:21,262 --> 00:05:23,516
Your focus is drawn here.

134
00:05:23,983 --> 00:05:24,175
Feeling:

135
00:05:24,583 --> 00:05:26,156
You develop a sensation—

136
00:05:26,382 --> 00:05:28,716
perhaps curiosity, or perhaps boredom.

137
00:05:29,142 --> 00:05:29,336
Perception:

138
00:05:29,903 --> 00:05:32,315
You are identifying what these sounds mean.

139
00:05:32,742 --> 00:05:32,935
Volition:

140
00:05:33,343 --> 00:05:34,675
You begin to judge—

141
00:05:34,702 --> 00:05:36,016
does this make sense?

142
00:05:36,223 --> 00:05:37,435
Should I keep listening?

143
00:05:37,702 --> 00:05:38,915
These five Universal dharmas

144
00:05:38,942 --> 00:05:42,076
operated simultaneously just now.

145
00:05:42,142 --> 00:05:43,836
Moreover, if you find it interesting,

146
00:05:44,103 --> 00:05:46,755
faith and vigor are also active,

147
00:05:46,862 --> 00:05:48,836
adding two Virtuous dharmas.

148
00:05:49,023 --> 00:05:50,302
If you feel tired,

149
00:05:50,302 --> 00:05:53,076
torpor and restlessness might be taking over,

150
00:05:53,142 --> 00:05:55,235
adding two Defiled dharmas.

151
00:05:55,249 --> 00:05:56,048
You see,

152
00:05:56,103 --> 00:05:58,942
the Sarvastivada school breaks down every second of your mental activity

153
00:05:58,942 --> 00:06:01,036
into these precise components.

154
00:06:01,343 --> 00:06:03,536
The fourth category is Disassociated (Cittaviprayuktasamskāra) dharmas.

155
00:06:03,942 --> 00:06:04,995
There are fourteen types.

156
00:06:05,023 --> 00:06:06,475
These are quite special.

157
00:06:06,502 --> 00:06:08,781
They are neither material nor mental,

158
00:06:08,783 --> 00:06:11,115
but rather some abstract regulatory existences.

159
00:06:11,343 --> 00:06:11,896
For example, 'obtaining' (prāpti),

160
00:06:12,382 --> 00:06:14,716
which is the condition for attaining a certain state.

161
00:06:15,103 --> 00:06:15,536
Life-faculty (jīvitendriya);

162
00:06:15,942 --> 00:06:18,156
the force that sustains life.

163
00:06:18,583 --> 00:06:20,795
Birth, persistence, change, and extinction;

164
00:06:20,903 --> 00:06:26,276
the four stages of everything from arising to vanishing.

165
00:06:26,502 --> 00:06:28,555
Even the concept of impermanence itself,

166
00:06:28,702 --> 00:06:32,036
in the Sarvastivada view, is a truly existing dharma.

167
00:06:32,142 --> 00:06:34,555
It's not just a label we attach to things.

168
00:06:34,862 --> 00:06:36,055
The fifth category is the unconditioned (asamskrta) dharmas.

169
00:06:36,343 --> 00:06:37,276
There are three types.

170
00:06:37,622 --> 00:06:39,255
The first four categories are all conditioned,

171
00:06:39,663 --> 00:06:41,276
created by causes and conditions.

172
00:06:41,423 --> 00:06:43,355
Unconditioned dharmas are not created by such causes.

173
00:06:43,502 --> 00:06:44,415
What are these three?

174
00:06:44,903 --> 00:06:45,336
First,

175
00:06:45,622 --> 00:06:46,396
extinction through deliberation (pratisamkhya-nirodha);

176
00:06:46,502 --> 00:06:49,915
the cessation of afflictions achieved through wisdom,

177
00:06:49,983 --> 00:06:51,076
which is Nirvana.

178
00:06:51,423 --> 00:06:51,935
Second,

179
00:06:52,182 --> 00:06:53,101
extinction not through deliberation (apratisamkhya-nirodha);

180
00:06:53,103 --> 00:06:55,101
cessation that isn't from active practice,

181
00:06:55,103 --> 00:06:58,716
but because the necessary conditions simply aren't present.

182
00:06:58,983 --> 00:07:00,555
The third is space (akasa).

183
00:07:00,822 --> 00:07:03,101
Space itself isn't something produced;

184
00:07:03,103 --> 00:07:04,435
it has always been there.

185
00:07:04,543 --> 00:07:06,062
If you add these five categories up:

186
00:07:06,062 --> 00:07:08,901
11 plus 1 plus 46 plus 14 plus 3,

187
00:07:08,903 --> 00:07:09,995
it equals 75.

188
00:07:10,262 --> 00:07:12,956
This is the Sarvastivada's universal inventory.

189
00:07:13,142 --> 00:07:13,776
They believe

190
00:07:14,062 --> 00:07:15,822
everything you experience,

191
00:07:15,822 --> 00:07:17,115
no matter how complex,

192
00:07:17,182 --> 00:07:19,815
is ultimately reducible to these 75 basic elements

193
00:07:20,023 --> 00:07:22,235
operating in different combinations.

194
00:07:22,702 --> 00:07:24,016
Does this remind you of anything?

195
00:07:24,502 --> 00:07:27,636
It's essentially a periodic table from 2,000 years ago.

196
00:07:28,302 --> 00:07:31,475
Chemists explain matter with 100+ elements;

197
00:07:31,622 --> 00:07:35,435
Sarvastivada explains all experience with 75 dharmas.

198
00:07:35,742 --> 00:07:37,636
The methodology is almost identical:

199
00:07:37,783 --> 00:07:41,235
reduce complexity to basic units,

200
00:07:41,262 --> 00:07:43,396
then analyze how they combine.

201
00:07:43,663 --> 00:07:47,115
That's why I call them the physicists of Buddhism.

202
00:07:47,343 --> 00:07:50,341
Their core worldview isn't intuitive or mystical;

203
00:07:50,343 --> 00:07:52,076
it's analytical.

204
00:07:52,343 --> 00:07:54,596
It's not about closing your eyes to feel emptiness,

205
00:07:54,702 --> 00:07:57,755
but opening your eyes to slice reality as thin as possible,

206
00:07:57,942 --> 00:07:59,435
until it can't be sliced anymore,

207
00:07:59,702 --> 00:08:03,355
and seeing exactly what each slice is.

208
00:08:03,942 --> 00:08:06,516
But the 75 dharmas are just their toolbox.

209
00:08:06,783 --> 00:08:09,915
The core proposition they use this toolbox to prove

210
00:08:09,942 --> 00:08:12,516
is what truly caused an uproar.

211
00:08:13,062 --> 00:08:13,855
Real existence across the three times;

212
00:08:14,062 --> 00:08:15,196
the eternal persistence of the dharma-essence.

213
00:08:15,463 --> 00:08:17,995
We touched on this concept in the last episode.

214
00:08:18,223 --> 00:08:22,036
Dharmas in the past, present, and future

215
00:08:22,062 --> 00:08:23,755
all truly exist.

216
00:08:23,942 --> 00:08:26,076
The essence of a dharma is always there;

217
00:08:26,103 --> 00:08:28,355
only its state of function changes.

218
00:08:28,862 --> 00:08:31,836
Let me use a concrete example to help you understand.

219
00:08:32,302 --> 00:08:35,155
Imagine a row of 75 switches in front of you.

220
00:08:35,623 --> 00:08:37,515
Each switch represents a dharma.

221
00:08:38,023 --> 00:08:39,255
At any given moment,

222
00:08:39,663 --> 00:08:41,475
some switches are on,

223
00:08:41,543 --> 00:08:42,916
and some are off.

224
00:08:43,302 --> 00:08:46,235
The "on" state means the dharma is currently functioning;

225
00:08:46,302 --> 00:08:47,475
that is the "present."

226
00:08:47,903 --> 00:08:50,916
The "off" state means it isn't functioning;

227
00:08:50,982 --> 00:08:52,422
it has either already passed

228
00:08:52,423 --> 00:08:54,115
or has not yet arrived.

229
00:08:54,543 --> 00:08:56,755
But whether a switch is on or off,

230
00:08:56,942 --> 00:08:58,956
the switch itself is always there.

231
00:08:59,182 --> 00:09:01,035
This is what "real existence in the three times" means.

232
00:09:01,503 --> 00:09:04,796
The dharma-essence exists throughout all three times;

233
00:09:04,982 --> 00:09:07,221
it's just sometimes running in the foreground

234
00:09:07,222 --> 00:09:09,076
and sometimes on standby in the background.

235
00:09:09,543 --> 00:09:12,155
You might immediately have a sharp rebuttal:

236
00:09:12,582 --> 00:09:15,596
one of Buddha's core teachings is impermanence.

237
00:09:16,062 --> 00:09:17,635
Everything changes;

238
00:09:17,743 --> 00:09:19,596
nothing is eternal.

239
00:09:19,903 --> 00:09:21,975
If you tell me the dharma-essence is eternal,

240
00:09:22,743 --> 00:09:25,056
isn't that openly contradicting impermanence?

241
00:09:25,822 --> 00:09:28,275
The Sarvastivada school responded like this:

242
00:09:28,582 --> 00:09:29,655
When we speak of "eternal existence,"

243
00:09:30,023 --> 00:09:31,716
we aren't saying that dharmas never change.

244
00:09:31,942 --> 00:09:34,076
The states of their function are always changing—

245
00:09:34,143 --> 00:09:35,741
moving from future to present,

246
00:09:35,743 --> 00:09:37,135
and from present to past.

247
00:09:37,503 --> 00:09:38,596
This is impermanence.

248
00:09:38,822 --> 00:09:42,755
But for a dharma to move from one state to another,

249
00:09:42,863 --> 00:09:45,475
it must first exist in its own right.

250
00:09:45,702 --> 00:09:48,461
If a dharma vanished completely in the past,

251
00:09:48,462 --> 00:09:50,936
how could it produce subsequent causal effects?

252
00:09:51,342 --> 00:09:53,836
If a dharma didn't yet exist in the future,

253
00:09:53,863 --> 00:09:57,576
how could a practitioner strive toward a goal that doesn't exist?

254
00:09:58,222 --> 00:09:59,375
Does this argument make sense?

255
00:09:59,881 --> 00:10:00,623
To be honest,

256
00:10:00,623 --> 00:10:03,196
it has an unsettling kind of logic.

257
00:10:03,462 --> 00:10:06,995
The law of causality requires a connection between cause and effect.

258
00:10:07,302 --> 00:10:10,501
If the cause no longer exists when the effect is produced,

259
00:10:10,503 --> 00:10:12,216
on what basis can the effect arise?

260
00:10:12,982 --> 00:10:14,296
The Sarvastivada answer is:

261
00:10:14,582 --> 00:10:15,875
The cause has not vanished;

262
00:10:15,942 --> 00:10:19,062
it has merely shifted from an active state to an inactive one.

263
00:10:19,062 --> 00:10:20,515
But it remains there,

264
00:10:20,543 --> 00:10:22,956
so the causal link is real.

265
00:10:23,383 --> 00:10:24,596
Interestingly, however,

266
00:10:24,663 --> 00:10:26,822
even within the Sarvastivada school,

267
00:10:26,822 --> 00:10:29,261
precisely how the "three times" truly exist

268
00:10:29,263 --> 00:10:30,716
was a subject of fierce debate.

269
00:10:31,062 --> 00:10:32,422
According to the Abhidharmakośa,

270
00:10:32,423 --> 00:10:35,676
four great masters provided four different explanations.

271
00:10:35,903 --> 00:10:36,796
Dharmatrata said

272
00:10:36,863 --> 00:10:39,635
it is the nature of the dharma that changes through the three times,

273
00:10:39,702 --> 00:10:41,676
much like milk turning into yogurt;

274
00:10:41,702 --> 00:10:43,916
the substance remains, but the nature changes.

275
00:10:44,062 --> 00:10:44,696
Ghosa suggested

276
00:10:45,062 --> 00:10:46,875
it is the characteristics of the dharma that change,

277
00:10:46,942 --> 00:10:50,556
just as a person looks different at various stages of life.

278
00:10:50,903 --> 00:10:51,456
Vasumitra argued

279
00:10:51,743 --> 00:10:53,515
it is the position of the dharma that changes,

280
00:10:53,543 --> 00:10:56,956
like a game piece moving from one square to another;

281
00:10:57,023 --> 00:10:58,475
the piece itself doesn't change,

282
00:10:58,503 --> 00:11:00,676
only its position on the board.

283
00:11:01,263 --> 00:11:01,855
Buddhadeva proposed

284
00:11:02,302 --> 00:11:04,182
it is the relation or status of the dharma that changes,

285
00:11:04,182 --> 00:11:06,556
like a person interacting with two people simultaneously;

286
00:11:06,582 --> 00:11:08,621
they have one relationship with person A,

287
00:11:08,623 --> 00:11:10,796
and a different one with person B.

288
00:11:11,023 --> 00:11:11,855
Four explanations,

289
00:11:12,222 --> 00:11:13,235
four analogies,

290
00:11:13,302 --> 00:11:15,556
and none could satisfy everyone.

291
00:11:15,822 --> 00:11:18,836
Vasumitra's explanation was later considered the most orthodox,

292
00:11:18,903 --> 00:11:20,155
but even so,

293
00:11:20,182 --> 00:11:22,355
the internal debates never fully subsided.

294
00:11:22,543 --> 00:11:24,895
When a school generates four incompatible explanations

295
00:11:25,062 --> 00:11:27,475
for its core doctrine,

296
00:11:27,582 --> 00:11:29,556
it reveals one thing:

297
00:11:29,702 --> 00:11:33,155
the inherent tension in the premise of "existence across three times" is real.

298
00:11:33,342 --> 00:11:36,155
But external critics were even sharper in their attacks.

299
00:11:36,462 --> 00:11:37,135
The Sautrantika school asked,

300
00:11:37,503 --> 00:11:39,995
"If you say the essence of a dharma is eternal,

301
00:11:40,023 --> 00:11:42,735
how is that different from the Brahmanical concept of a permanent Self?"

302
00:11:43,182 --> 00:11:46,515
The Buddha's very mission was to oppose this clinging to permanent entities.

303
00:11:46,663 --> 00:11:48,942
You've built a sophisticated classification system,

304
00:11:48,942 --> 00:11:53,196
yet your foundational assumption is exactly what the Buddha told you to let go of.

305
00:11:53,702 --> 00:11:55,995
The later Madhyamaka school was even more direct.

306
00:11:56,462 --> 00:12:01,475
In his Madhyamakakarika, Nagarjuna dismantle the logic of Sarvastivada point by point.

307
00:12:01,863 --> 00:12:02,216
He said:

308
00:12:02,663 --> 00:12:04,956
"If the essence of a dharma is eternal,

309
00:12:05,023 --> 00:12:06,576
then it exists independently;

310
00:12:06,863 --> 00:12:08,196
it would therefore have a 'self-nature' (svabhava).

311
00:12:08,423 --> 00:12:09,576
If it has a self-nature,

312
00:12:09,863 --> 00:12:11,836
it cannot participate in dependent origination.

313
00:12:12,023 --> 00:12:15,662
Because the definition of dependent origination is that everything arises based on conditions;

314
00:12:15,663 --> 00:12:17,395
nothing has an independent self-nature.

315
00:12:17,822 --> 00:12:19,422
You cannot speak of dependent origination

316
00:12:19,423 --> 00:12:22,475
while ascribing self-nature to the very elements that are supposed to be dependent.

317
00:12:22,702 --> 00:12:24,995
This is a logical contradiction."

318
00:12:25,222 --> 00:12:27,076
This critique was almost fatal.

319
00:12:27,462 --> 00:12:30,475
It pointed out the deepest internal tension of Sarvastivada:

320
00:12:30,743 --> 00:12:33,836
they tried to analyze the world using the Buddha's framework of dependent origination.

321
00:12:34,023 --> 00:12:35,916
But their analytical tools themselves,

322
00:12:35,942 --> 00:12:38,155
the seventy-five dharmas with inherent existence,

323
00:12:38,342 --> 00:12:40,755
directly violate the premise of dependent origination.

324
00:12:41,102 --> 00:12:42,916
It's like a physicist saying,

325
00:12:42,982 --> 00:12:45,076
"I study the universe through reductionism,"

326
00:12:45,383 --> 00:12:48,475
but when asked what the fundamental particles are,

327
00:12:48,663 --> 00:12:52,316
claims they are unanalyzable, eternal, ultimate entities.

328
00:12:52,663 --> 00:12:55,076
Modern physics has already moved past this stage.

329
00:12:55,623 --> 00:12:56,436
We know that

330
00:12:56,462 --> 00:12:59,436
even fundamental particles are not truly solid entities.

331
00:12:59,623 --> 00:13:01,716
They are just excited states of quantum fields,

332
00:13:01,783 --> 00:13:03,015
relationships and processes,

333
00:13:03,342 --> 00:13:04,596
not fixed objects.

334
00:13:05,023 --> 00:13:07,515
As we said when discussing cosmic emergence,

335
00:13:07,623 --> 00:13:11,062
particles are more like a melody hummed by spacetime geometry

336
00:13:11,062 --> 00:13:12,916
than tiny hard balls.

337
00:13:13,543 --> 00:13:17,022
The philosophical dilemma Sarvastivada faced 2,000 years ago

338
00:13:17,023 --> 00:13:19,836
is strikingly similar to that of modern physics.

339
00:13:20,182 --> 00:13:21,535
The deeper you analyze,

340
00:13:21,822 --> 00:13:22,836
the more you realize

341
00:13:22,863 --> 00:13:25,755
that the foundation you thought was solid is not.

342
00:13:26,342 --> 00:13:28,076
Particles are not the ultimate existence,

343
00:13:28,182 --> 00:13:30,275
and neither are the dharmas.

344
00:13:30,783 --> 00:13:34,755
But this discovery only begins when you start analyzing seriously.

345
00:13:34,942 --> 00:13:38,916
If Sarvastivada hadn't questioned the nature of dharmas,

346
00:13:39,143 --> 00:13:41,115
Nagarjuna would have had nothing to deconstruct.

347
00:13:41,503 --> 00:13:44,115
This is the strangest part of intellectual history.

348
00:13:44,462 --> 00:13:46,596
Some mistakes are great mistakes.

349
00:13:46,743 --> 00:13:51,035
Only because someone walked a path to its very end

350
00:13:51,222 --> 00:13:54,422
could those who followed see where it leads,

351
00:13:54,423 --> 00:13:56,355
and where it doesn't.

352
00:13:56,663 --> 00:13:58,316
Returning to our calibration anchor:

353
00:13:58,702 --> 00:14:02,355
Is Sarvastivada closer to or further from

354
00:14:02,582 --> 00:14:03,975
what the Buddha saw under the Bodhi tree?

355
00:14:04,543 --> 00:14:06,635
I think it’s a two-sided answer.

356
00:14:06,863 --> 00:14:07,895
Methodologically,

357
00:14:08,222 --> 00:14:09,235
it moved closer.

358
00:14:09,462 --> 00:14:11,916
The Buddha said all things are dependently originated;

359
00:14:12,062 --> 00:14:15,796
Sarvastivada asked what the units of that origination are.

360
00:14:15,982 --> 00:14:17,995
This direction of inquiry is correct.

361
00:14:18,222 --> 00:14:21,316
You can't stay on the macro-narrative of dependent origination forever;

362
00:14:21,462 --> 00:14:24,155
someone has to do the micro-deconstruction.

363
00:14:24,582 --> 00:14:25,975
But in terms of its core spirit,

364
00:14:26,302 --> 00:14:27,355
it moved further away.

365
00:14:27,582 --> 00:14:29,916
The Buddha's dependent origination is absolute;

366
00:14:29,982 --> 00:14:33,155
nothing can escape the web of interdependence.

367
00:14:33,423 --> 00:14:37,956
By placing dharmas with inherent existence at the bottom,

368
00:14:38,102 --> 00:14:41,676
Sarvastivada laid a foundation of independent existence beneath it.

369
00:14:41,942 --> 00:14:44,596
This is exactly the illusion the Buddha wanted us to see through.

370
00:14:44,942 --> 00:14:46,995
You think you've seen the ultimate reality,

371
00:14:47,102 --> 00:14:49,796
but that reality itself is dependently originated.

372
00:14:49,942 --> 00:14:51,556
Yet it was this very deviation

373
00:14:51,582 --> 00:14:53,836
that sparked an even more powerful return.

374
00:14:54,222 --> 00:14:56,475
When Nagarjuna later wielded the sword of Madhyamaka,

375
00:14:56,663 --> 00:15:00,515
his first target was the Sarvastivada idea of eternal dharma-essence.

376
00:15:00,783 --> 00:15:01,696
Without this target,

377
00:15:01,982 --> 00:15:03,875
that sword would have had nothing to strike.

378
00:15:04,423 --> 00:15:06,916
Intellectual progress is never a straight line;

379
00:15:07,302 --> 00:15:08,875
it's more like a spiral.

380
00:15:09,182 --> 00:15:12,035
Moving forward seems like drifting from the start,

381
00:15:12,222 --> 00:15:13,576
but it's that very deviation

382
00:15:13,903 --> 00:15:15,716
that creates new perspectives,

383
00:15:15,783 --> 00:15:19,316
allowing the next generation to look back from a higher vantage point.

384
00:15:19,543 --> 00:15:23,596
Sarvastivada left two legacies for Buddhist thought.

385
00:15:24,143 --> 00:15:25,995
First is the methodological legacy.

386
00:15:26,462 --> 00:15:31,515
It proved Buddha-dharma can be studied with rigorous analytical tools.

387
00:15:32,102 --> 00:15:35,676
This tradition reached its peak in the Abhidharma system.

388
00:15:36,302 --> 00:15:37,296
What is Abhidharma?

389
00:15:37,903 --> 00:15:40,816
Why is it called the source code of the Buddhist operating system?

390
00:15:41,423 --> 00:15:44,096
How shockingly sophisticated is this system?

391
00:15:44,822 --> 00:15:45,375
In the next episode,

392
00:15:45,663 --> 00:15:46,956
we'll break it down.

393
00:15:47,503 --> 00:15:49,836
The second is the legacy of a negative example.

394
00:15:50,182 --> 00:15:52,275
Its dilemma showed later generations that

395
00:15:52,302 --> 00:15:54,196
reductionism has its limits.

396
00:15:54,423 --> 00:15:57,275
Once you slice the universe into its smallest parts,

397
00:15:57,302 --> 00:16:00,395
you find the parts themselves require explanation.

398
00:16:00,822 --> 00:16:03,316
The knife of analysis cannot cut down forever,

399
00:16:03,342 --> 00:16:04,556
because in the end,

400
00:16:04,582 --> 00:16:06,716
the knife itself is dependently originated.

401
00:16:07,023 --> 00:16:09,875
If this story sounds familiar,

402
00:16:09,903 --> 00:16:13,115
it is because modern science is undergoing the same journey.

403
00:16:13,383 --> 00:16:15,416
From atoms to protons and neutrons,

404
00:16:15,663 --> 00:16:17,316
from quarks to string theory,

405
00:16:17,383 --> 00:16:19,981
every time we think we have found the fundamental unit,

406
00:16:19,982 --> 00:16:23,155
we discover that it can be further deconstructed.

407
00:16:23,462 --> 00:16:26,436
Physicists have yet to break out of this cycle,

408
00:16:26,903 --> 00:16:31,155
but the Buddha offered a possible exit 2,500 years ago.

409
00:16:31,702 --> 00:16:34,035
Perhaps there is no ultimate fundamental unit.

410
00:16:34,462 --> 00:16:37,035
Perhaps relationship itself is everything.

411
00:16:37,062 --> 00:16:41,796
Perhaps searching for an ultimate entity that exists independently,

412
00:16:42,023 --> 00:16:45,035
is in itself the deepest form of attachment.

413
00:16:45,462 --> 00:16:46,096
What do you think?

414
00:16:46,783 --> 00:16:47,775
At the end of reductionism,

415
00:16:48,062 --> 00:16:49,296
where do we truly arrive?

416
00:16:49,822 --> 00:16:50,535
I am Leo Wang.

417
00:16:50,903 --> 00:16:51,970
See you next time.
